The worst-kept secret in Minnesota sports history is "secret" no more: The Twins will host the All-Star game at Target Field on Tuesday, July 15, 2014.
As you may know, only one other team was "bidding" on the right to host the event, but the odds against the Cubs were pretty long. For one thing, '14 is an American League year since the location still roughly rotates between leagues as a vestige of the days when home field advantage in the World Series also rotated in a similar manner (and the days when the "league" distinction actually meant more than the DH rule).
But even the centennial of the venerable Wrigley Field could not overcome the fact that it is a decrepit relic of a ballpark, barely able to host a regular major league game, let alone one of the biggest events of the baseball season.
I certainly feel the same warmth and affection for the old place that everyone feels, but there's a reality which has not yet been addressed on the north side of Chicago. Once they get the place shored up (or -- dare I say it? -- replaced), they'll certainly get their turn.
At Wednesday's press conference, Bud Selig said again that he used to have to "beg" cities to take the game, and maybe that's somewhat plausible, but nobody had to beg the Twins. Maybe you remember this scene from September 10, 2008:
That's the roof of the Target Center, where a very similar cast of characters gathered to announce, in grand fashion, that they were bidding on the event which was then six years in future. At the time, it was really pretty clear that the application was essentially the award, even though the ballpark experience being assembled some 400 feet away was still mostly imagination.
Selig confirmed as much at the press conference, calling the decision to award the game to the Twins "pretty easy". More and more it looks like there is a pecking order by which these decisions are made, factoring in league rotation, new/renovated ballparks, and time since last hosting. That actually makes it possible to guess where the game might be played in each of the coming years:
2013 (NL) New York (Citi Field)
2014 (AL) Minnesota
2015 (NL) Washington
2016 (AL) Toronto (possibly post-renovation)
2017 (NL) Los Angeles (Dodger Stadium, post-renovation)
2018 (AL) Tampa Bay (assumes new ballpark circa 2016)
2019 (NL) Cincinnati
2020 (AL) Oakland (assumes new ballpark circa 2016)
2021 (NL) Chicago (Wrigley Field, post-renovation or rebuild)
2022 (AL) Baltimore
2023 (NL) San Diego
2024 (AL) Texas
2025 (NL) Miami
2026 (AL) Cleveland
2027 (NL) Philadelphia
I've modified this list a little bit since it was first published to reflect the Astros' move to the AL, which eliminates the need to double-up on NL teams once per cycle, but doesn't otherwise change much.
There are a few other things to consider. First, as of this writing, the Nationals don't seem to be interested in hosting in 2015 despite the slam dunk if they applied. They could be looking at the progress of development in their new neighborhood and calculating that it wouldn't be done in time for such an event. Frankly, given what I saw there, that would be a very conservative estimate. If I had to guess, I'd say the neighborhood will be packed to capacity with hotels and condos by that point. It's already stacked pretty high.
Currently the Reds and Marlins are going for 2015, with the Reds favored since they haven't yet hosted in their new ballpark. It may be necessary to swap Washington and Cincinnati in the above list.
Setting aside Wrigley, Tampa Bay and Oakland remain the two clubs still needing ballpark replacements, and it's not clear at all that they will get those any time in the near future. And, unlike Toronto, it's a little hard to imagine the game being played in either the creaky Coliseum or under the Tampa catwalks.
Toronto comes due in 2016 and will have a lock if they do anything to upgrade Rogers Centre. The Dodgers have already been open about plans to spiff up Dodger Stadium, making 2017 theirs for the taking.
The Wrigley problem doesn't really come due until 2021 (they last hosted in 1990), the possible exception being if they decide to move or tear down and rebuild. That could lead to a sentimental pick, a la Yankee Stadium, in which the old park gets one last shot before going offline. Frankly, I don't see it happening unless they do something substantial to make things better there, both for fans and players. The politics will probably drive this one. (And you may have heard that Cubs ownership did themselves no favors by making a substantial donation to the Republican presidential nominee at exactly the moment they hit up the hard-left Democratic mayor of Chicago for some funds. Political retribution knows no greater home than Chicago.)
Beyond that, 2022 will be the 30th anniversary of Camden Yards, so it makes sense. The remainder of the line up is based mostly on length of time since last hosting. Should there be another round of ballpark replacements (which, though unlikely, is hard to predict), everything could change again.
There certainly was a weird vibe at the press conference on Wednesday, with the guys standing behind the current speaker often bowing their heads as if they were discussing a death in the family. It could be that the whole Mauer-on-waivers fiasco overshadowed the joyous news a little bit. I'm sure there were a few people there who were preoccupied with that story.
In fact, despite the fact that a bunch of us fans lined up outside of gate 34 to watch the proceedings, only twice was there ever spontaneous applause from anyone about the announcement. It was mostly a polite smattering as each speaker was announced. Far from a pep rally, this was a business transaction, plain and simple.
And so will be getting tickets to the game. The Strib published a skimpy primer on what to expect, but it comes down to this: Either go back in time and become a full STH a few years ago, or start saving your pennies and buying rabbit's feet. There's no denying that most of us will be enjoying this event the same way we watch all the other All-Star games: on TV.
But this is definitely the big feel-good moment of the Twins' 2012 season, and there were some stars and other familiar faces on hand. It's definitely very cool to see the ribbon boards in the stadium lit up with the good news.
Image 1 of 13
From left: Rod Carew, Tim Laudner, Twins historian Clyde Doeppner (behind), and Bert Blyleven
31 recent recognized visitors, including: ben, Excited, gogotwins, gus munger, Jorge, luke, Rick, terry, Tom D.
This page was last modified on September 1, 2012.
"You talk about the magic, the aura, but what really makes a stadium is the fans. Concrete doesn't talk back to you. Chairs don't talk back to you. It's the people who are there, day in, day out, that makes the place magic."
– Bernie Williams
Explore the Site
Here are 50 images chosen randomly from the 3033 found on this site. Click the image to be taken to the original post. A new list is created every 10 minutes.
Discovered on the upper concourse!
You won't see much sky from these seats, but you'll always be warm
"Original" or "Dinger" Dog
LRT station has appeared.
The plaza as seen from the B ramp.
Ballpark magic: Infield materializes (click to enlarge)
Cross section diagram of the field structure. (Click to enlarge.)
There's the opening through which the groundskeeping equipment will emerge (and disappear).
Killebrew taught, "Always make your autograph legible, boys."
One more time from the third base side.
Fun with section counting!
Row indicators are spray-painted with stencils over rust and peeling paint.
Opening Day 2008 (By Currier & Ives)
Serious home dugout work in progress.
Hardware in the window! (But why are there three trophies? 1924?)
View from the Overlook
The right field overhang as seen from Seventh Street (with dude)
Fan number 3,030,673 came through this gate a few moments after I took this picture.
Roped off for the LRT crowd
I will take a picture of just about anything.
From the revised site plan, this is the configuration of Gate 34 Puckett.
Press box, hallway to the print room
What has been actually built so far is only a tiny subset of this vision.
Here's one big problem with a retractable roof: completely terrible seating in left. These scant few seats would have been tucked under the track. No sunshine, no open concourse, it was a terribly kludgy idea. With some hindsight, it's very clear that adding a retractable roof on this small site would have required compromises which would have just been too extensive to tolerate. Without it, the design was free to grow into something much more memorable.
This is an angle I have not used very much, from the top of the Fifth Street ramp. Because the wall is so tall (forget about watching a game from here for free -- OK, maybe with a step stool) I have to hold the camera up over my head and just snap, hoping I get something good. Here I did. This view then looks to the southwest.
Millers fans leaving Nicollet Park after a game in 1923, where a trolley was waiting. (Click to enlarge.)
This is what I was working on while my photo was taken (click to see a VERY BIG version).
Note reflected sunset (7:30 PM). Could be a worry...
An early concept for the pedestrial bridge. (Source: Ballpark Authority, RP)
That's Tony Oliva checking out ballpark construction from the roof of Target Center.
If you are into shade, there are lots of opportunities. This is from the last row in section 108 -- scoreboard not blocked in the least.