Next game at Target Field: Royals at Twins
Playoff Challenge    Archive    Target Field History    Theme:

Oh, the Ideas!

September 28, 2006 12:41 AM

Dave St. Peter really hopes you like the new Twins ballpark. He has said it to me and to anyone who will listen, and I believe him. Clearly, he has put fan comfort and enjoyment above a whole lot of other things in his ballpark dreaming. In this regard, he has his priorities straight. (For the record, St. Peter has been very kind to this web site, answering my questions quickly and in a very straight-forward fashion. My hunch is that he's also great to work for. And no, I'm not looking for a job.)

This puts the Twins in something of a special category when it comes to ballpark design. I suspect other teams have received suggestions from fans about their new ballparks, and some teams have probably even solicited them. But I know of no other case where such a concerted effort has been made to get the fans involved. It's become a mantra. And I'm convinced that, in taking this to heart, they have a chance of building a truly great baseball place.

Twins president Dave St. Peter

Twins president Dave St. Peter presents his list of fan suggestions to the Ballpark Authority

St. Peter is fond of saying that he fully expects there will be fans who walk into the new park and can point to something and truly say, "That was my idea." (For the record, I hope to point at the newly-restored Met Stadium flag pole!)

Back in August, the Twins released a compilation of some 2500 suggestions they had received directly from fans. These were all neatly entered into an Excel spreadsheet (downloadable here) and offered to the Ballpark Authority members in the interest of full disclosure and cooperation. At that point, the Twins had not yet formally asked to be allowed to design the park themselves. Since then, they have asked for and been officially granted this right.

That little change means that the design process is no longer really public at all. The Twins have been interviewing architects and engineering firms, and will be selecting one -- can you guess which one? -- in private. Then all of the design work will happen outside of the public eye, and a design will simply be presented to the Authority (and the public).

The only reason I don't like this is that I can't follow it. All of the brainstorming and other creativity will go on behind closed doors. Great ideas may fall victim to group-think or "we don't do things that way." There is the very real risk that a private process could devolve into a "make it like Camden Yards" approach. That would be bad.

Everybody Has An Idea

I hope the architects and engineers will read the suggestions, because they are pretty entertaining. We fans are very passionate about what we think makes for a great baseball place. St. Peter has started highlighting one idea per blog entry, but there are many more which are worthy of being heard -- if only to understand more about how the fans think about a new ballpark. Plenty of the ideas have not been heard anywhere else.

Anaheim detail

I saw it at another park...

The ideas seem to fall into vague categories. First, there are the requests for things which are pretty much given, such as wider seats and aisles, more restrooms, historical references (statues and museums), seats which face the infield, etc. Second, there are requests for things which are not really up for discussion, such as the name (lots of calls for honoring Kirby), the location, and the roof (or lack thereof). Third are the suggestions for adding local flavor, from pine trees, lakes or waterfalls in the outfield, to a wide variety of food requests. Fourth is a long list of Things I Saw At Another Park which they think should be copied here, from fountains to ferris wheels to fireworks.

There are also lots of contradictory suggestions. For every fan who hates the baggie, there's another who wants to keep it. For every fan who wants a hitters park, there's another who wants a pitchers park. For every fan who wants a manual scoreboard, there's another who wants everything state-of-the-art. For every fan who wants the bullpens in foul territory there's another who insists they be beyond the outfield walls (one fan simply pleaded earnestly to make sure there are bullpens in the new park). For everyone who wants a classic brick facade, there's someone who wants something more modern and unique. For everyone who wants amusement park rides, there's someone who hates the idea.

The milk carton also turns out to be highly controversial. Some fans love it and want it made bigger and placed even more prominently. Others just wish it would go away forever. (I think I'm with the latter group.)

Roof Redux

One area in which there is virtually universal agreement in these suggestions is the roof. People from out-state are still lobbying furiously for a roof -- retractable or not. Surprisingly, many point to Milwaukee as the model to follow, despite the fact that Miller Park's roof may be the single ugliest, most expensive and most obnoxious feature of any park built in recent memory. And it leaks.

I remain staunchly anti-roof, and I believe there are some very good reasons to avoid building one (and not a single compelling reason to spend the extra time and money). But it's clear that this could be a real public relations issue for the team. They are going to have to make sure that the word gets out about just how few rainouts there were back at the Met.

I'm also surprised to read so many negative comments about wheelchair seating at the Metrodome. I honestly had no idea it was as bad as described. But fixing this really must be on the list of "givens."

Suggestion Box Sampling

Then there are the unique, offbeat and creative. I haven't had time to read the entire list, but here are some which jumped out at me:

"Finish the inside walls of each dugout with Knotted Pine. It will provide a subtle Northern Minnesota look when TV cameras pan inside the dugouts to view the players & coaches."

Classic Twins Logo

"...a large neon version of the classic 'two guys' logo would be spectacular in center field. Whenever the Twins hit a home run, the two guys would shake hands across the river."

"Post team photos of every Twins team in history in the concourse."

"Maybe a Red (outfield) wall."

"i think it would be great to have some type of tower that an eagle or hawk lived in at the ballpark"

"Put Buttons On Seats, that represent different foods or drinks. then the vendors will have a computer thing and it shows them what seat pressed the button and then will deliver the food or drink."

"Have a river rock backstop, similar to the brick backstops at Wrigley and in Pittsburgh. It will make for interesting bounces on wild pitches/passed balls."

"Put a Paul Bunyan statue somewhere that blows either a load or else steam out of its nose everytime a twin gets both hit by a pitch and a homerun in the same game."

"An aquarium with native MN fish in it built into one of the outfield walls."

"Most importantly a more relaxed beach ball policy."

"A couple rows of corn should grow within view behind the outfield."

"Have coin operated heated seats."

"So many people seem worried about 'rain outs' since the new stadium will not have a roof. Work out a deal with Mall of America or a Water Park, Valley Fair, the MN Zoo, some downtown theaters, movie theaters, or restaurants, etc. so that when a rain out occurs a Twins Ticket will be accepted as admission or as a coupon to use at their venues."

"Please, no murals of famous Minnesotans etched in laser-cut brick relief."

"In the right center field wall I think you should add a dugout, which would be enclosed but also stay padded for players safety. You would be at about knee level while watching the game. Sort of like a sky box, but underground. Seating about 20-30 fans."

"For a Minnesota theme, how about a section of the outfield with a cabin, with ... a large deck where selected patrons could sit and watch the game from the outfield cabin deck."

There's a sample of some fine (if occasionally odd) Minnesota creativity. I'll post more as I have time to continue reading the list.


To utilized enhanced comment features, please enable cookies in your browser.

Rather than a retractable roof, I still urge a cantilevered roof with columns and beams. Columns and beams from the bottom of a roof and from a ballpark's exterior provide unobstructed cover to fans in the upper deck. RFK Stadium has such a roof. RFK Stadium and the past Atlanta Fulton County Stadium are worth a look. RFK Stadium's roof covers most fans in the upper deck. AFCS's roof shared that characteristic. A similar size to those roofs will achieve the same quality. Such a roof is beautiful, too! Thanks for your time.

Posted on September 28, 2006 at 12:56 PM by CK Highlight this comment 1

I love your website - very informative and very well done! However, I do not agree with your criticism of Milwaukee's Miller Park - and its roof. Miller Park has been open for six years now, and has hosted over 500 events, including major league baseball, college baseball, high school baseball, youth soccer, bowling, concerts, and so forth. We have never experienced a weather related delay or postponement at Miller Park! Over 1/2 of our fans come from outside the five county metropolitan area, and the certainty of the scheduled event has helped the Brewers attract an average of over 2.2 million fans per year. To put 2.2 million fans in perspective in Milwaukee, only twice in the history of baseball in Milwaukee has a team drawn more than 2.2 million fans - once in 1957 and once in 1983 (remember our few and far between World Series appearances?). Also, Sports Illustrated has rated Miller Park #1 and #4 (of the 30 MLB ballparks) in their two Fan Index Surveys the last two years. We are incredibly proud of Miller Park in Milwaukee - and we sincerely appreciate all it has done for our community. Therefore, the roof is right for Miller Park, and Miller Park is right for Milwaukee. While we are all entitled to our opinions, please lighten up on your criticism of Miller Park.

Having said all that, the decision to include or not include a moveable roof is entirely up to the community, and is clearly "apples and oranges" from community to community. Your sentiment on the lack of need for a roof in Minneapolis appears to match the majority of the Twin Cities citizens' wishes and desires. For that reason alone, to not have a roof is the right decision for the Minnesota Twins!

Again, congratulations on a great and informative website. I visit often, and enjoy the thought-provoking content. Thank you!

Posted on October 1, 2006 at 5:23 PM by Mike Duckett Highlight this comment 2

It's still an ugly roof.

Posted on October 2, 2006 at 8:49 PM by tito Highlight this comment 3

This is a great website and miller park looks like a gym with that ugly roof also it is located in the middle of no where, what is there to do? nothing.

Posted on February 19, 2007 at 12:18 AM by Kevin Highlight this comment 4

Miller is not that great. I went there after touring Kauffman Stadium(Beautiful, a gem) Old Busch (Meh) Jacobs Field (Beautiful) Comerica Park (Beautiful) US Cellular (Does the Job) and finally Miller Park. Miller Park is extrememly nice in its features and food and seats facing the field, but it doesn't have a ballpark feel to it. Even when the roof was open it felt like it was enclosed. Don't get me wrong, it was lightyears ahead of the dome, but a very weak park considering it was built in the last 10 years.

Posted on March 15, 2007 at 11:06 AM by steve Highlight this comment 5

This page was last modified on January 21, 2010.

"You talk about the magic, the aura, but what really makes a stadium is the fans. Concrete doesn't talk back to you. Chairs don't talk back to you. It's the people who are there, day in, day out, that makes the place magic."

– Bernie Williams

Explore the Site

Here are 50 images chosen randomly from the 3046 found on this site. Click the image to be taken to the original post. A new list is created every 10 minutes.

Center field seating

One more exterior view shows that, while the original look was attractive in a way, it seems to be a variation on the look of the Washington ballpark (albeit with a much more coherent collection of elements). What's remarkable is that the design team has refined the concept amazingly well, improving it immeasurably. What we're actually getting is clearly descended from this, but it's in a whole different league:

The reverse angle shows that the signage will only partially obscure views from the top of the ramp. The wall is pretty high up there, so you'll need something to stand on, but it appears that this is one of the so-called "knotholes".

Loading docks to the right, VIP entrances to the left.

Very interesting detail starting to appear here.

Town Ball Tavern balcony

Bag checking at Ball Park Lanes was incredibly simple, as was the pick up later. The line was short and fast-moving.

This is the main entry to the Pro Shop. The second entry, located just outside the turnstiles, is indicated by the arrow.

Original Concept - With a Retractable Roof

Not much facade left to be finished at this point.

Rooftop scaffolding, for the wind veil installation?

Looking from the middle of the third base side back toward the entry door

The restaurant.

North Loop Deli

Photo by Jeff Ewer

The back row of seats in straight-away center. Note that, beyond those seats, you can see the planters (for flowers) on the front of the Left Field Bleachers.(Batters Eye)

It's pretty easy to see right into the Twins dugout!

Here's a closer look.

CBP: retro in facade only

This is what it looked like during the first open house in March.

Noah is checking out the ample leg room and truly exemplary sight lines.

The equivalent spot on the model.

Giant screened images! (573 Club, my back to Seventh Ave windows)

A flurry of action in front of the dugout before the game (Photo by Jeff Ewer)

Imagine this!

The glass area seen here is one of the warm-up areas.

From the revised site plan, this is the configuration of Gate 34 Puckett.

Just one lane of traffic and a couple of feet between the fence in right-center and the wall of the parking ramp!

ght that was cool.

A slightly different elevation drawing, again viewed from Fifth Street, with some labels. (Click to enlarge.)

The back gates at Comerica park, like everything else, a bit overwrought.

Sue Nelson, and her organ, in one of the Twins Pubs

It's pretty easy to see right into the Twins dugout!


BPM - Ballpark Magic

BRT - Bus Rapid Transit

DSP - Dave St. Peter

FSE - Full Season Equivalent

FYS - Fake Yankee Stadium (see also: NYS)

HERC - Hennepin Energy Resource Company (aka the Garbage Burner)

HPB - Home Plate Box

HRP - Home Run Porch

LC - Legends Club

LRT - Light Rail Transit

MBA - Minnesota Ballpark Authority (will own Target Field)

MOA - Mall of America

MSFC - Minnesota Sports Facilities Commission (owns the Metrodome)

NYS - New Yankee Stadium

SRO - Standing Room Only

STH - Season Ticket Holder

TCFBS - TCF Bank Stadium

TF - Target Field

Selected Bibliography - Analysis


First Edition (1992)

Second Edition (2006)


Selected Bibliography - Surveys


Second Edition (1987)

Not a "Third Edition" exactly,
but it replaced the above title

(2000, large coffee table)

Original edition (2000, round)

Revised edition (2006, round)

(2001, medium coffee table)

(2002, small coffee table)

(2003, medium coffee table)

(2004, very large coffee table)

(2006, very large coffee table)

Combines the previous two titles
(2007, medium coffee table)

Selected Bibliography - Nostalgia


Book and six ballpark miniatures

Complete Bibliography

BallparkMagic™  •  3300 Bloomington Avenue  •  Minneapolis, MN 55407  •  (612) 392-3104
This is a fan site and in no way affiliated with the Minnesota Twins, Minnesota Ballpark Authority, or Major League Baseball.
Unless otherwise noted, this page and all of its contents are Copyright © 2001-2010 BallparkMagic/Lowell (Rick) Prescott.
All Rights Reserved. Used by permission. Privacy Notice