|
Tweet
Picture of the Day
BallparkMagic presents a little bit of Target Field each day. (Click to enlarge.) IntermissionJuly 14, 2009 10:54 PM Time for a quick break from my strolling tour of last week (and from trying to put the finishing touches on my train article -- I promise that it's coming as soon as I get a few facts checked) to take a new look at the Target Field model. The model, which has made the rounds over the last couple of years, is currently housed at the Twins sales office in the Multifoods tower. A good friend of this site took some photos during a ticket consultation, and there are lots of details to be extracted. First and foremost, there's this:
Yep, I think we can consider it confirmed that Target Field will feature as its signature image the original Twins logo! This neon sign is likely to be animated, though there's no way to tell yet just how. Shaking hands would be simply amazing. I'm sure the team is being creative on this. For the younger crowd, this logo (seen at right on the cover of the original Twins 1961 program) depicts the "twins" of Minneapolis and St. Paul baseball teams shaking hands over the Mississippi River. You read that right: The original Twins logo, which will be depicted in a very large manner at Target Field, contains a Minneapolis Millers player and a St. Paul Saints player -- complete with their original team logos on their uniforms -- shaking hands over the river. It's a depiction of the two formerly adversarial fan bases coming together to support one team. If you ever wondered why they aren't the Minneapolis Twins, there is your reason. For those of us who remember those early years, this is an amazing and iconic image which captures much of the spirit of the original team. The Washington Senators, from which the Twins sprang in 1961, were primarily known as perennial losers (though not as lovable as the Cubs). Baseball fans in the Twin Cities were certainly excited for the arrival of Major League baseball, but they were also accustomed to winning. Thus it made sense for the Twins to immediately align themselves with the two beloved -- and largely successful -- franchises which they would be displacing (both teams disappeared with the arrival of the Twins). With their stadium having been built (sort of by luck) in neutral territory, it was completely plausible to become "Minnesota's team" rather than selecting an identity aligned with one city or the other. Thus was Twins Territory born. The logo pays respect to the very long history of baseball in this region, tying the Twins directly to their ancestors, acknowledging and celebrating in one image the deep love for the game found in these parts. Nothing could be more appropriate to have as a signature piece at Target Field. Other Details Here are a few more details which can be teased out of the pictures. First, let's look at the Budweiser party deck.
The bar is underneath the party deck roof, and that square just outside the roof is the fire pit. On the front you can clearly see steps where people can sit/stand to watch the game. Next up, a good look at the press box. I do wish that those letters said "Herb Carneal Press Box" but I realize that sentiment only goes so far. For the record, it reads "Welcome to Target (logo) Field."
Just below the press box, you can see the moat -- actually two moats. The inner one protects the Champion's Club, while the outer one isolates the Dugout Box sections. Interestingly, if you look at the Dugout Box area, you can clearly see how a subtle level of asymmetry has been designed into the grandstand.
We also get a look at the layout of the Champion's Club itself, which lies directly behind those seats beneath the grandstand. Here's a quick look at the Puckett Atrium and some of the details on how it will be finished.
Next, a quick look at the Suite and Club Levels, including a peek at the suite mock-up in the sales office.
Now for an updated look at a couple of the gates.
And, finally, a few great shots of the revised plaza model.
Special thanks to our good friend, jfh, for providing the snaps. But I'll leave you where I began -- with one of those finishing touches which can turn a good baseball place into a great one.
CommentsTo utilized enhanced comment features, please enable cookies in your browser. Awesome detail, I'm gonna love that sign. This ballpark is unreal and it's great how they have included so much cool stuff. Hopefully we can create a new park that will be around for 100 years like Wrigley. On the party deck, I believe the fire pit is along the east side, and not under the canopy. The fireplace on the party deck is the smaller rectangle on the outside of the roof, underneath is the bar area. and I know there's been lots of speculation around here about the 2012 ASG. Vince Micucci: And 2012 will mark the 100 year anniversary of Fenway Park and Wrigley Field in Chicago. Would the Players Association and Major League Baseball be willing to have two All-Star Games in the centennial ballparks? Commissioner Selig: We have not made a decision on the 2012 All-Star Game, and Boston just had an All-Star Game in 1999. We have a lot of new stadiums where All-Star Games have been promised. But that is a great moment. I believe the Cubs are up in 2014 if memory serves me correctly. Click my name for Selig's annual ASG "State of the Union" address and Q & A session.
Posted on July 15, 2009 at 07:08 AM by luke
Did you count the flagpoles? Was there not four originally? Yep, Ben, good catch. There were four poles on the original model, the fourth being essentially flush with the edge of the outfield pavilion. But they only put up three in the actual ballpark -- which happened long ago. It may be that the model was changed to reflect reality. Ah, flag poles. What next? Posted on July 15, 2009 at 08:56 AM by Rick 7 Oh, and thanks David_Mpls for correcting the location of the fire pit. Duh. Don't know what I was thinking. I corrected the article. Posted on July 15, 2009 at 09:09 AM by Rick 8 never knew the original logo was a tribute to the millers & saints. that is awesome. thx for the elucidation, rick. Awesome analysis, Rick. I love that sign in center field! Wow - an interior suite rendering!?! What is this demonry!? I've walked through the "shell" of the Champions Club. It will be a very cool experience for those who get the opportunity to attend a game there. I propose that 2 tickets be held out and given to random Hennepin County citizen fans for each game. :) The logo in center, and this ballpark altogether, are going to be amazing. The Twins really did it right, as did the Gophers with TCF. I can't wait to see the grass go in next month. Did they connect the seats in center where the gap was before? Anyone think they'll light up the "TARGET FIELD" sign that sits on top of the Metro Club? ok rick you schooled me also, i didn't know the "twins" represented the millers and saints, i thought it was just the two cities traditional rivalry being depicted. that just makes the logo display even more awesome as there is a lot of baseball history represented. I noticed this week some twins ads on bus shelters i havn't seen before, having fun with the real grass vs. turf differences. After watching the All Star Game last night at Busch Stadium III, I have to say I am very underwhelmed by the place. Sure the brick exterior is gorgeous, but other than the St. Louis skyline, which disappears quickly after the sun goes down, there is nothing that makes it more that meh stadium. Nothing iconic in the outfield, no weird quirks, just a field. It helped me make up my mind that I do like the right field overhang at Target Field, and having all those left field seats makes the ballpark feel more intimate. And of course that sign in center field is the cherry on top. So yes there is a line between fun and Disney like, but in my opinion, both are a whole lot better than Busch's meh feel. After being in in the new Busch stadium, I have to say that while it's nice, it's not anything terribly great. Busch III seems like the definition of "meh" to me. Maybe it's an optical illusion, but the main grandstand looks substantially taller than Target Field. There is no sense of intimacy at all. I like the little touches (castings) on the wall behind home plate. But when that's the most interesting thing you can find about a ballpark, it has to be called underwhelming. Maybe people who have been there can shed some light on what it's like in person. Posted on July 15, 2009 at 10:56 AM by Rick 17 I've been there a couple times, and for better or worse, it's HUGE. Mostly worse. It somehow manages to be less intimate than it's cookie cutter predecessor. But it's in a good location. Getting from your seat to the street is easy too. Betaband, I bet you want the MSP Twin to push the STP Twin into the river, don't ya? haha The wood art of Puckett is a wonderful addition. Modern & classy, just like the rest of T.F. Rick - great article. Like others, I did not understand the history behind the original logo. I think its' inclusion in the park is a fantastic tribute to Minnesota baseball fans and the Twins deserve much credit for incorporating the historical reference into the new park and resisting the obvious temptation to place more advertising space in it's place. Quite frankly, this "one-ups" NYS and the facade, because of it's prominent position in the park. I wish I had thought to ask more about it during my visit. OG Jeff - if all of the Champions Club seats are not sold on a full season basis, it's quite possible that the Twins may sell what remains either day of game or for the upcoming homestand, since, unlike Legends Club seats, these are not "owned" by the season ticket holder. (Someone please correct me if this is not true). Now, if like other clubs with such areas, I'm sure the Twins will use some of the unsold seats for promotional purposes, either internal or external (and I suspect the club has held back some seats in that area anyway. I know they have held back tickets in Home Plate Box for MLB use (golden tickets, etc.). I have to wholeheartedly agree with the Busch analysis. Several friends that have been there have said it's a nice place to watch a game but not a "great" park. I've never been, but other than the Arch is seems very underwhelming. There is no character whatsoever in the outfield seating. Their canopy is a nice throwback, but seems more like a contrived retro. Although one could say that Nationals Park is the first "modern" ballpark (it, also, is very underwhelming(, I think Target Field will be the first successful modern field... So - given Selig's comments that the Cubs may be lined up for the All Star game in 2014 (which, if true, would imply that we will have back/back games again for one league), any thoughts on a revised schedule for the Twins? Do the Twins take 2013 instead of the Mets, since NYC had the game last year? Do they bump the Royals? Slide back a few years? Or do we all hope that Bud mispoke and that they are the most likely candidate for 2014? I'm sure that the Twins are asking some questions today. My impression was that the Twins can't really come out and say they are going after the 2014 game unless they have a reasonable degree of certainty that they'll get it. It sounds like these things are kind of like the classic smoke-filled room types of deals. The Cubs last hosted in 1990. The Twins in 1985. 2014 is an AL year. I think Selig misspoke. Won't he be gone by the time that decision has to be made? Posted on July 15, 2009 at 11:44 AM by Rick 25 Great post Rick. As for the logo in center-field, it is on par with the minor tweaks as the ball has the correct stitching. This is an awesome website! I came up to the Sox-Twins series last weekend. I stayed at the Univ. of Minnesota and took the # 16 bus to the games. That worked out great! I've heard that there will be a "bus hub" at Target Field. Do you know where that will be located yet??
Posted on July 15, 2009 at 12:30 PM by shill
Welcome, shill! The big bus transfer area is already in operation on the ground floor of the B ramp (that's the parking ramp which cuts a notch into Target Field). With all the talk about rail, it's easy to forget that TF will also be a bus-rider's dream. Posted on July 15, 2009 at 12:45 PM by Rick 28 Good catch, Matt, on the stitching. I know that has been a source of annoyance for some throughout the years. For those who don't know about it, take a close look at the program cover up there and compare the baseball stitching to the Target Field sign. It has been corrected on the sign. Posted on July 15, 2009 at 12:46 PM by Rick 29 Thanks for the bus info! As for those taking the 16 from the U, I must say this! Bring on 2014! Target Field is going to simply keep improving as Metro Transit keeps improving. Imagine the day when you can hope a light rail or commuter rail from all corners of the metro and deposit yourself within a short walk of the ballgame. At the moment, we have a taste of it, but Target Field is going to be simply so much greater in that department as time progresses.
Posted on July 15, 2009 at 12:51 PM by James Berka
Thanks for the bus info Rick! I can also chime in on the St Louis ballpark. I'm from Iowa (don't hold that against me!) I've been to the new Cards park twice. I agree with the "it's nice, but nothing spectacular" comments already made. My biggest problem with it is the fact that the main concourse is not open to the playing field. That's what I'm really looking forward to at Target Field. After a few innings I like to roam, stand, and "explore" a ballpark. That's what I like best about US Cellular Field in Chicago, and that's going to be a super aspect of Target Field!!
Posted on July 15, 2009 at 12:55 PM by shill
I have a question, and I apologize if it has been asked and answered previously. I see that the gates are numbered and named after Carew, Hrbek, Oliva, and Killebrew. I thought there was also a gate for Puckett, or some other prominent part of the park. What exactly will be the recognition of Puckett in the ballpark, and where is it in the ballpark? If you want to direct me to a previous link or two about this, that is perfectly fine with me. The main gate, which enters the park from the plaza, is Gate 34 Puckett. In addition, the Puckett Atrium is a part of the Legend's Club, images of which can be seen above. Posted on July 15, 2009 at 1:06 PM by Rick 33 Click my name for an interesting article about radio ratings. It's interesting here because the Twins are definitely in need of a new radio partner, preferably to include a local FM station. I'm not sure how others feel, but I hate KSTP. The test of a baseball radio station is when you get in the car the next day, after listening to a game the night before. Whenever I do that with KSTP it's some obnoxious (and logic-challenged) talk radio loser (yeah, I'm looking at you, Soucheray). It has literally made me think twice about turning on the game while I'm in the car. That's just not right! So, are the Twins bringing down KSTP's ratings, or is KSTP bringing down the Twins' ratings? I think it's the latter, and I bet you could prove it within the numbers. Posted on July 15, 2009 at 1:14 PM by Rick 34 New Bush Stadium does not have open concourse, that's kinda shocking. I wonder if there is a reason for that. I would have figured all the newer parks would have open concourse, interesting. I'm really excited about the old school logo. I'm sure they'll make it work if it's just lit up or has moving parts. I like how Calvin originally wanted to call the Twins the Twin Cities Twins as opposed to the Minneapolis or St Paul Twins. They ended up keeping the TC hat logo in the end. Sounds like they went out of their way to avoid offending either city, which was a smart move. That Miller-Saints rivalry was pretty nasty from what I've read. Also will be nice if the Saints are able to build a new stadium in Lowertown. A ballpark at either end of Central Corridor would be incredible. I should add that the Twins broadcast itself, especially the post-game show, has improved a lot since they left WCCO. It's not the Twins' fault that I hate KSTP. Posted on July 15, 2009 at 1:17 PM by Rick 37 Rick...I feel your pain. I'm not sure if I hate KSTP or if I just hate the Twins announcers. We used to have awesome radio announcers with Hall, Carneal and Scott. Gordon is god awful and Gladden has a terrible radio voice. That said, the content of the pre and post game has improved. But I don't know about the production quality. Being that I live in AZ and I much prefer to listen to baseball than watch it (it's a generational thing that young people just don't understand) I subscribe to MLB.com gameday audio (only $15 for the entire year). I listen to dozens of games and by far the Twins Radio Network broadcast as the WORST sound quality. My 1966 GE transistor radio has better sound quality than their production. Does it really sound that bad on the air in MN??? When I listen to the Dodgers online, it's crystal clear, the Twins sounds like John Gordon is speaking through a tunnel. My biggest issue with KSTP is the horrible signal inside the house, and I had a ton of interference while driving AROUND TARGET FIELD! I don't think it's signal weakness, but it seems extremely prone to interference from the downtown "noise" where WCCO, and of course all FM stations are clear as a bell...everywhere. Rick: Carl and his boys have been buying up radio stations in the Twin Cities (B96 among others) the last few years. I believe the KSTP1500 contract is up soon (end of 2010 I think). Look for the Pohlads to take the Twins "in-house" and to begin swimming in more Benjamins as this is where they will control all the revenue!!! For me while the reception on KSTP sucks, especially after dark, the main beef is with the broadcasting crew (John Gordon, Dan Gladden,etc.). Gordo gets easily confused, loses track of the outs, balls & strikes, goes off-topic way too much and for too long (we are listening for the GAME not your thoughts on Harley Davidsons or the fishing report on Lake Mille Lacs), and last but not least calls plays wrong or says one thing when an entirely different thing actually happened. Ultra annoying especially when you are watching on TV and notice this. I am a realist however. Gordo is in the Twins back pockets. He pretty much has a lifetime contract. I don't expect any changes in the near future. What was corrected on the stitching? I guess I don't know what to look for. The signal strength of the KSTP broadcast to "Twins Territory" ends after dark when you get just a mile from Hudson, WI. The broadcast literally cannot be heard. Not everyone in WI is a fan of the NL team from the other side of the state. As far as broadcasters, I can't stand it when Gladden refers to the player between 2nd and 3rd as the "shirtstop". Drives me nuts! i agree the team needs to find a new radio home. the signal is just not strong, even in the city, i don't care what the team and kstp claims. people have been complaining about this ever since the team switched, it's not a new issue and has never been addressed. i wish the team had agreed to a contract with KFAN when the rights were up for negotiation a couple years ago, but whatever. every time i hear the constant soucheray ads during twins games, i just lower the volume. ive never liked john gordon either. we used to make fun of his hyper homerun calls when he first started with the team. even to this day he'll make it seem like a ball is gone by the inflection of his voice, only to have our hopes dashed when the ball is caught at the fence. and the cardinal rule of radio play-by-play is to constantly give the number of outs, which is so badly lacking by gordon and dan gladden, they seem to forget at times they're speaking to a radio audience. ok enough bitching.... James - It's a minor tweak from the current one. Click name.
Posted on July 15, 2009 at 2:00 PM by MATT
god rest his soul but herb carneal didn't do it for me. he was the pat summeral of baseball radio ("robert smith...[7 seconds of dead air]...outta bounds..."). On July 3rd (the night of the marathon game vs. the Tigers) I was shocked to pick up the Twins game while sitting in the Sky Sox stadium parking lot in Colorado Springs. I'm absolutely sure it was KSTP, and reading these comments makes it all the more shocking that the signal won't make it to Hudson but will make the 730-mile flight to Colorado. I completely agree w/ all KSTP talk...thing that really has made me mad is how Gordo will do a few innings and then Gladden takes over for 3 innings and then Gordo comes back and does a few, etc...why can't they just work together throughout the game? I understand Gordo is getting up there in age but 3 innings to take a piss? Also, does anyone know if the TF model is open to the public? If so, where is it located? The thing about Kstp is the signal is not as strong as Wcco so you barely get out of the metro area and you lose the broadcast and what broadcast you do get sounds terrible. Wcco had A much better signal that had better range and sound. They have finally completed the area in the right field corner it seems. It looks like they have boxes lined along the first base line, so that area between the completed section and right field may be next. I didn't get so much a feeling of height from the main grandstand at Busch Stadium as opposed to it feeling too spread out. Perhaps its an optical illusion, but the park seems much wider from the front of the stands to the rear and then to the exterior than most of the new parks. The outer brick facade also seems to not link up well with the interior seating deck. It's as if the two elements were designed separately and then linked up later without much thought about how they'd connect. One odd quirk of sorts is the break in the roof along the top deck of the third base/left field line. In the open space are two brick towers, 4 lighting towers, and a Hardee's. It looks a bit odd in the overall scheme of things, but seems as if it could be a fun hangout/party area. The choice of restaurant, sponsorship money or not, leaves much to be desired, however. Rick, you hit the nail on the head with the desire for an FM signal. When I'm driving up north, listening to the FM stations out of Alexandria and Little Falls on the Twins radio network really show how terrible the AM quality is for KSTP. It was pretty depressing last weekend making the switch to 1500 coming down I-94. I really hope a local FM station gets the next contract (for the Vikings as well). was at busch and the K a few weeks ago.. great location for busch...but other than that it was basiclly just a nice ballpark...the new K i think blows it away...and the food at busch sucked except for the bratzel...beer was 8.25 i think... luckly we sunck in a bottle ajndsu, The Vikings have been on FM 100.3 KTLK for about the last 3 years. RE: Radio Ratings KSTPs ratings aren't down, they are being measured differently. You can't compare the previous measuring system (diaries) and the new one (electronic meters). It's not intellectually honest. If you measured your speed in MPH and then Kilometers per hour, you wouldn't be going faster with the KPH, you'd be measuring it differently. The new electronic meters are likely more accurate, but should only be compared to other electronic metering data. (Does being forced to listen to Steve Miller at Subway count as radio "listening"? Technically it does, I guess, even if you're trying to ignore it. But that seems to be a different behavior than driving in your car trying to listen to a program/ballgame.) I second the obeservation that Twins Radio Network has TERRIBLE quality on MLB gameday audio. By far the WORST in MLB. Also, totally agree about KSTP. Tired of the talk show blowhards. And finally, for what its worth, I like Gordo. I'd rather here him and his honest mistakes than Bert and his cranky SOB "Why-doesn't-everyone-always-pitch-complete-games?!! shtick. For all you kids, my link has a couple of clips of vintage Halsey Hall. I only wish someone had a clip of him during bat day - those were hysterical! On the second clip, you can hear the wonderful Met organ in the background playing Win Twins.
Posted on July 15, 2009 at 3:00 PM by kevin in az
Sadly it doesn't surprise me that many of you claim to be huge Twins fans but know very little about the history of the team, how Minnesota came about to having a team, its original home or logo. Many of you probably never knew the Millers existed until Rick brought it up. Perhaps if you invested one-tenth of the amount of time you spend watching people getting punched in the nads on YouTube on "book learnin'" you might gain a better, deeper appreciation for things like Twins baseball. Here's a neat clip of Herb Carneal, including the last out at the Met.
Posted on July 15, 2009 at 3:06 PM by kevin in az
Truth Hurts, I'm old enough to remember those days. I remember the double-headers when the first game was in St. Paul and the 2nd game was at Nicollet. I remember the fans getting into fist fights on the streetcar going between the 2 stadiums....those were the days. And that Willie Mays and Ted Williams played for the Millers. Did somebody say Sid Hartman??? I have him remembering Halsey Hall thanks to the Pavek Museum.
Posted on July 15, 2009 at 3:24 PM by kevin in az
If you measured your speed in MPH and then Kilometers per hour, you wouldn't be going faster with the KPH, you'd be measuring it differently. The new electronic meters are likely more accurate, but should only be compared to other electronic metering data. I don't think so. Sounds to me - and I have no dog in this fight - that it's more akin to measuring your speed with a stopwatch vs. a radar gun. You're saying the units are different, but that's not true. strategery, You're analogy is better. The units are the same. BUT...to use your analogy: If we're clocking the same pitcher, one with the watch, one with the radar gun...the guy's fastball didn't change, just how we measured it. He's not suddenly a better pitcher since the gun reads his fastball faster. With this new radio measuring technique, the whole landscape has changed, so comparing old data with new data doesn't work. Wow truth hurts aren't you quick to draw generalizations about the people who post on this blog. This is especially surprising considering that the people who post on here are obviously interested and passionate about the Twins and the new ballpark and their postings reflect that. No one is writing any juvenile or confrontational posts on here that should even conjure such a reaction from you. Heaven forbid some people appreciate finding out about a piece of Twins history that perhaps is new to them since it was before their time. They may not know about the history between the two ballplayers shaking hands depicted in the old logo, but you obviously don't understand the meaning behind it since instead of extending a hand to new and younger Twins fans you instead give a slap to all those you feel are less knowledgeable then you. They are not the embarrassment to this blog, you are. Anyone not familiar with what my response is in regards to need only look about 10 posts up from this one. Absolutely insulting! I think the point, re: electronic metering of radio, is that it measures everything that is being listened to - i.e. ambient radio (as mentioned in the article) that someone who used to keep a diary might neglect to record. And since that would be mostly music as ambient radio (in stores, at work, etc.), talk radio suffers (assuming that the previous diary holder wasn't recording that listening). In summary, it is a different way to measure listening. A more acurate way. I don't know if the MLH/KPH is an acurate comparison, but there is definatly a diference between the old way and the new way, and I agree that you can't compare the old numbers to the new. At all. And in the end, that's the point. Moose Sounds like Truth must be having a bad day. We all succumb to a "you kids get off of my yard" post once in a while. (If you've never done it, get ready. It's coming. And, as suggested, Sid is the absolute master.) I'm satisfied with the level of knowledge and discourse here. We all have things to learn and things to teach. Posted on July 15, 2009 at 4:28 PM by Rick 70 As for KSTP, my beef is they won't go HD. I had a long conversation a year or so ago with the station manager about this. He acts like its a fad and that nobody cares. Well, by the sound of it, you folks care. Those listening online would benefit by the better quality of sound. A good HD signal would do wonders locally, but it won't solve the station power issue, unless switching to a HD signal gives them a better all around range, which would take help of the FCC.
Posted on July 15, 2009 at 4:34 PM by James Berka
I'm not sure it's more accurate. These pagers record everything a listener is exposed to, while a diary records what the listener remembers. In truth, neither method completely captures what advertisers really need to know, but I'm not sure what would. Advertisers just want their ads heard, and ratings theoretically help in making such decisions. But I spent a few years in radio and, let me tell you, sometimes the advertisers are just buying snake oil. Posted on July 15, 2009 at 4:34 PM by Rick 72 You'd think that DSP would take the All Star break to update his blog and advertise what the Twins are doing to lure the ASG to TF. Rick's photos show that they have at least thought of creating some marketing products. Oh wait, I forgot, this is DSP we're talking about. It's not just KSTP Berka, this weeks British Open is broadcast by the BBC and the American stations that are covering it (TNT ABC) have to use their SD signal. The refuse to change to HD. ABC will at least be up converting the SD signal so we don't have those annoying black stripes on the side of the picture. KSTP not going to HD is unsurprising. The Hubbards have never seemed like ones to spend money on production. Compare the way channel 5 has long lagged behind 4 and 11 in terms of sets, graphics, and overall production on its newscasts. I tend to listen to the Twins on XM rather than 1500. The only problem is XM uses the home team's broadcast only. That means going to the AM dial for the road games and the poor audio quality seems even more apparent for the away games. Here is Brauer's follow-up to the morning article on radio ratings. Posted on July 15, 2009 at 4:42 PM by Rick 76 And a final note. Posted on July 15, 2009 at 4:44 PM by Rick 77 Regarding Busch III's upper deck gap, I think that has something to do with the way it was built. The outer part of the 3rd Base grandstand was built last - because Old Busch was still on the site. (See pick at link)
Posted on July 15, 2009 at 4:48 PM by Alex B.
Oh, and here's a cool time lapse film of Busch II's demolition and Busch III's construction. Sure, they could have filled that gap in, but it's kinda part of both the design and the history of the site.
Posted on July 15, 2009 at 4:53 PM by Alex B.
Could we all just stop posting and please let 'butt hurts' I mean, 'truth hurts' post. PLEASE PLEASE bestow upon us your wealth geniusness! I em such an idiet i kant even spelt rite I thought the "gap", also seen in parks like Cincinatti, Detroit and our own TF, was to separate "high priced" from "low priced" seats in the upper reaches. I know we don't talk NHL here, but we do talk ballparks, click my name for the article proclaiming Fenway as the host for Winter Classic 2010. I'm beginning to think that TF is a more viable candidate for a Winter Classic here, than TCF Bank Stadium.
Posted on July 15, 2009 at 5:14 PM by luke
haha well put everyone toward truth hurts. does someone need a hug? Luke, you're thinking of the moat. A gap(which TF does not have) is a literal break in the grand stand.
Posted on July 15, 2009 at 6:17 PM by Eric in TX
or this...
Posted on July 15, 2009 at 6:17 PM by Eric in TX
Eric - I was thinking back to an old thread here (Finally found it, Click my name to go to it, called "One Topped off...") and the following comment: "Going back to what David_Mpls was talking about WAY back at the beginning of this thread... I was looking for the "hole" he was talking about and it made me take a closer look at the seating chart for TF. I always thought that the gap between sections R and S (Legends Club to Skyline Deck) was space that would be filled in. Now I see that it is essentially another moat seperating the "high end" seats from the other sections. Am I the only one that thinks they are loosing some PRIME seats??? Also it seems there is no info about the Skyline Deck pricing. Are these going to be single game tickets only? Thanks for the info. Posted on June 10, 2009 at 10:52 AM by CSG Mike 102 " That's where I was thinking "High end" from "low end"...
Posted on July 15, 2009 at 6:30 PM by luke
That gap at GABP is rediculous, it serves no purpose whatsoever, and is ugly as hell. Hey everybody, it's the frontman of "Megadeth" ! Rick, Thank you for shedding your baseball insight upon the masses of imbeciles. Kids, here's something for you: Bruno was the Twins' right fielder during the 1987 championship season, not an Austrian in love with the donger. ("Automobile!?") Rick, Has "ignore" functionality been enabled for posts. I have a fresh candidate for my list. The Truth Hurts, wow. You're cool. Thanks for joining us! Any particular reason for the harsh words? I can't wait to learn everything you know and someday be just like you! Cause ya know I have been a twins fan for all my life and gee, sorry guys, who is the Twins first baseman? I always forget. Silly me! :) Welcome, Megadeth and fans! If at any point you are asked to "turn down all that infernal racket", please be aware that this does not necessarily represent the views of management. Posted on July 15, 2009 at 7:26 PM by Rick 92 Third Webcam. It's called a question mark. It's down and to the right of the "L" key. Use your right pinky to reach it. Now that that is out of the way.... We all know the Twins' front office has a reluctance for looking outside of AAA for help, but it's kind of frustrating that they--apparently--weren't interested in signing a guy like Pedro for $1 million, considering our starting five is a bit shaky right now. Call him a washed-up future hall of famer, but so is Favre, and Minnesota sports fans seem to be keen on him coming here. One million dollars just seems reasonable, especially if Pedro is healthy like he claims to be. Truthbag: It's called a typo. Does it really detract from my sentiment?? Perhaps I was so taken aback that someone would actually troll in a ballpark blog that I had a momentary loss of motor function. Oh, by the way, your mom just called. She wants you to get up to the kitchen. Your ramen is ready. Mom jokes are old and worked over. Like your mom. Let's try keeping this blog classy, huh guys? I think the Rickmeister would agree. C'mon guys. Let's not turn anybody into a Tommy Herr, okay? Back to the old school logo, I think I miss the days of the Minneapolis-St. Paul rivalry. I wasn't around for it, obviously, but I've read enough to know there was some serious hate between the two cities. In the early days, a lot of it was fueled by James J. Hill, who along with John Ireland ran St. Paul and didn't want anything to do with Minneapolis. After that, the real manifestation of the rivalry existed between the two baseball teams. Even Joe Mauer, when he first bought a town home, said that his dad wouldn't let him move to Minneapolis. Just think if both cities had been granted major league teams when the Western League broke up to become the AL? If only... how apropos: angst and vitriol infect the blog when the ghosts of millers & saints are conjured... mwah-ha-ha! hahaha well put Elston Gunn! haha oh truth hurts, arent you just a card?!?!?! bleh k i'm done :) @The Legacy, I sure would love to see the dramatic, and they would be dramatic, differences between St. Paul and Minneapolis's ballparks. One can only imagine. Luke - the Skyline seats on the Club level will have a seperate entrance from the Legends Club. There is no pricing on them because they are not sold as season tickets and the plans are not to sell them for individual games other than for group sales. I suspect they are also the seats "reserved" for additional sales to Legends Club and Champions Club season ticket holders, but I don't know that for a fact. No, the Skyline seats are general public seats that do not have access to the Legends club, I thought they are single game only. I also am of the opinion that it isn't big enough to constitute being called a "gap." The gaps at other ballparks are way bigger and are generally in the entire facade.
Posted on July 15, 2009 at 8:49 PM by Eric in TX
I smell haves and have not seatting causing issues.....I also see food being different and possibly even bathrooms. Next thing will be third class for the steerage Truth Hurts - Comparing Favre to Pedro Martinez is laughable. For one, Pedro isn't better then all 5 of our starting pitchers. Favre, I would say IS better then our quarterbacks. Also the revenue generated by Favre (sellouts and jersey sales) would far exceed that of Pedro. I for one am glad we did not bring in Pedro Martinez, the Twins bringing in washed up vets gets old after awhile. Eric in Tx - the Skyline seats may be "general public" in that they are not going to be sold as season tickets, but they are going to be sold to groups, not individuals. (Whether there will be day of game sales is unknown). I also agree with you that this shouldn't be considered be a "gap" - it was clearly thought out and by design. I'm glad that both didn't get a team, well unless one was NL and one was AL but the cities are way too close There's no way the metro could support two MLB teams, but 'tis interesting to think about a Mpls.-St. Paul rivalry. Though if Burnsville gets the Millers (crickets chirping) ... BUTT HURTS, THANK YOU THANK YOU FOR YOUR POSTS! PLEASE DISREGARD THESE IMBICILS WHO CLAIM TO BE TWINS FANS! LETS BOTH GO TOGETHER TO THE SPECIAL PLACE IN THE SEWER WHERE WE CAN BE ALONE AND REVEL IN OUR PUTRID UNBRUSHED TEETH AND FLABBY MAN BOOBS, TO A PLACE WHERE WE WILL NOT BE MADE FUN OF FOR OUR DECAYING AND IMPOTENT UNDERCARRIAGE, AND WHERE BEST OF ALL...WE WILL PLOT TO KILL BATMAN!
Posted on July 16, 2009 at 12:20 AM by THE PENGUIN (aka dirwin7)
Is it just me, or does our great state seem a little... mis-shapen on that sign? The Saints played at Lexington Park in Saint Paul until they moved on to become another team then another Saints team moved in if you want a little history. And that Met stadium was built paid for and owned by the city of Minneapolis for a time even though it sat in Bloomington. And it was suggested to Calvin Griffith if he wanted to widen the fan base he might consider changing the name to the Minnesota Twins to attract fans outside of the metro area. I suppose I could go on with more trivia but is there a point. I doubt it. There are tons of people here who know plenty they just dont mention it. I would guess there are more Twins fans here than most anywhere else but its just a guess. enten, the misshapen outline of mn is by design. all, responding to dinks on this blog only encourages them to post more. Hide Facebook box
3 recent recognized visitors, including: Steve
This page was last modified on January 16, 2010. |
"You talk about the magic, the aura, but what really makes a stadium is the fans. Concrete doesn't talk back to you. Chairs don't talk back to you. It's the people who are there, day in, day out, that makes the place magic."– Bernie WilliamsExplore the SiteHere are 50 images chosen randomly from the 3004 found on this site. Click the image to be taken to the original post. A new list is created every 10 minutes.
Oh, nevermind. I'm not sure why there's a wreath on Gate 3. (I quickly checked the headlines for any dreaded Killebrew news. Whew.) It looks to be in celebration, maybe of the move. Click to enlarge greatly. See yourself? Window area sketched by the limestone Gate 29 Carew (note the walkway above open to the street where you can shout down at your lost friends to tell them where to meet you) Oh, a flag pole will be so much more...dignified Frost on the pumpkins, snow on the plaza Close-up on the diagram of the Club Level with finishing materials (click to enlarge) You'll be able to park here for a quick stop at the Pro Shop or ticket window. Security cones? Viewed from up Sixth Street, the tip of the canopy looks like the claw of some gigantic crustacean! Section 125, Row 1 Hubert's remains the only sports bar within site of the Dome after 28 years of its existence. It's a cautionary tale. Wright's Marin County Hall of Justice, San Rafael, California (1959) Memorabilia on display in the Metropolitan Club TC meets the Mayor (Photo by Jeff Ewer) Photo by Jared Wieseler The Fifth Street side is pretty busy. There's a small street entrance to the B ramp, then ticket booths and an entrance gate, a rare exterior section not covered in limestone, the wooden screen covering the circulation ramps, the administration building, and finally (just out of view) the interface with Northstar. All of that sits behind the LRT action. How pedestrians will interact with this side of the park is a great mystery to me. You know that Metro Transit won't be letting them cross the tracks anywhere but at either end of the block... Before the team came out to warm up, Kirby Puckett, Jr. was playing Frisbee out in center. A view straight on of the Pro Shop area and ticket windows (just barely visible). The piers you see beneath the plaza are already almost completed (see final photo). Solution for a hot night, just inside Gate 34 (that's a cool mist, by the way, not hot steam, which would be kind of cruel) Here's the view of the entrance ramp to 394. Looks like they are painting... Up close, this is what you'll see as you walk along. Photo by Jeff Ewer Double plays will be turned here. Welcome Visitors From Two Men On (Accessiblity) Glossary BPM - Ballpark Magic BRT - Bus Rapid Transit DSP - Dave St. Peter FSE - Full Season Equivalent FYS - Fake Yankee Stadium (see also: NYS) HERC - Hennepin Energy Resource Company (aka the Garbage Burner) HPB - Home Plate Box HRP - Home Run Porch LC - Legends Club LRT - Light Rail Transit MBA - Minnesota Ballpark Authority (will own Target Field) MOA - Mall of America MSFC - Minnesota Sports Facilities Commission (owns the Metrodome) NYS - New Yankee Stadium SRO - Standing Room Only STH - Season Ticket Holder TCFBS - TCF Bank Stadium TF - Target Field Selected Bibliography - Analysis Selected Bibliography - Surveys
Selected Bibliography - Nostalgia |