So Who Gets to Name the New Twins Ballpark?
June 6, 2006 12:30 AM
OK, that's what I would call it. Unfortunately, I don't have enough money to buy the naming rights -- but maybe if we all pooled our pennies...?
On the other hand, with asterisks swirling around the game, maybe there is some gigantic corporation interested in attaching its name to a paragon of baseball virtue. Maybe somebody like Hormel might want to honor a true, homerun-hitting, Hall of Fame, non-performance-enhanced legend:
Killebrew Field at Hormel Park
Now, that has a real ring to it!
It would certainly be a 180-degree turn from the current naming culture:
- Citizens Bank Park (blue suit, red tie)
- Great American Ballpark (insurance with cheese)
- Ameriquest Field (made-up corporate crap word)
Clearly, there is a pattern here. But if the Twins are going to go down that same path, there have been precious few clues about it. This is a little odd given how visible the TCF naming deal was to the University of Minnesota's stadium drive.
All the speculation I've read starts out with the list of local companies who might have the resources. But it might be helpful to look more closely at the naming trends in major league parks. I'll stick to baseball parks because the naming deals are at least partly the result of the economic conditions of the sport. In other words, a company which might be able to work with an NFL team (Ford Motor Company, for example) may not be able to work within the economics of baseball. (I'm assuming this, without doing any heavy research on the subject.)
To the right is the list of companies which currently have their names on major league baseball parks, sorted by business category.
Some things are obvious: money companies rule. But if you look a little more closely, other guiding principles can be teased out.
First, all of these companies sell products directly to the public. In other words, they do not supply parts or manufacture goods which are then repackaged for marketing. The company name is right there on the product. Wholesalers and other strictly business-to-business entities are utterly absent.
Second, they are industries in which there is fierce competition -- where consumers have choices. There are no drug companies, and no medical supply or manufacturing companies even though they have gobs of cash to spend. No one goes into the operating room saying, "I only want a Medtronic brand pacemaker!"
Third, successful sales in these industries often lead to long-term relationships with customers. It's a hassle to change your bank, your insurance company, or your phone company. Though it's not a hassle to change soft drinks, people get into habits, and catching the customer's attention can lead to years of repeat business.
Fourth, the goods they sell have very large target markets. The closest thing to a niche marketer on the list is Petco, but a whole lot of people have pets. In the case of McAfee, the stadium bearing their name is in the heart of software country, meaning their products and services are in great local demand.
Fifth, beyond just being companies, these are all brands. Developing a brand identity takes a long time, so budgets and results are often measured in decades rather than quarters or years. This is the scale on which naming deals are made.
What am I missing?
It's also interesting to look at the other arena names in our own market. Neither of them fall into the categories above, but some of the principles apply.
Target certainly doesn't have to build a brand identity here, but it does have to stave off competition from Wal-Mart. I look at that name as a sort of marking of their territory.
Xcel is a little more complicated because, as a utility, consumers don't really have a choice about whether they will use their products and services (who else can you buy your electricity from?). More likely is that the name was still very new (replacing the venerable NSP and Minnegasco), and having it on an arena aided the integration of the new identity. I'm not sure I understand this one at all, so I'm open to suggestions.
Returning to the categories above, at left are Minnesota companies from the Fortune 1000 which fit the five criteria. I eliminated all the medical, chemical and business-to-business companies, as well as a few oddballs which really have no chance of factoring into this equation. (The complete list is available here.)
Two things allow for the possibility that it will be a company not on this list. First, it would not necessarily have to be a Minnesota-based company, though it would probably need a substantial presence here to make the investment worthwhile (see sidebar below). Second, there might be an up-and-coming company just off the list which could use stadium naming to further establish a growing brand.
For that possibility, I give you the Star Tribune 100 (cached here with a link to the original because the Strib purges all the interesting information almost as fast as they post it -- what is it with newspaper web sites? They are not very friendly.)
I tried to find a comprehensive list of major employers in Minnesota, but it's difficult to come by.
A couple of major names not on any of these lists could also get into the running. Qwest, DirecTV, DishNet and Time-Warner Cable are all in the running for the very large internet and television market. And all of the cell phone companies in the market could have their eyes on this project as well.
To begin sorting through these lists, we have to consider what a company gains by getting their name on a stadium.
Because this is all about advertising, and because it's the ultimate in short-form advertising, the most suited companies will already have some brand recognition, be in a business everyone needs, have a product which requires little or no explanation, and have gigantic profit margins and gobs of cash.
(I know I said above that medical/drug companies are out, but given the huge amounts of money currently being spent on drug advertising on TV, can it be long before we're watching games being played in Levitra Park?)
Stadium naming cannot be any company's entire advertising budget, so it simply serves as a reinforcer, and a way to worm their name into a community's collective subconscious. And it only works over the long-term. Lasting sales gains may only be seen five to ten years down the road.
The wall of brands at General Mills headquarters in Golden Valley (Source: RP)
As for companies with brands to promote, Hormel seems to leap out of the list. Taking a look at their brands, it's clear that the Hormel name is everywhere. Rather than using a sub-brand (like Spam), they could simply go with Hormel Field and gain exceptional brand exposure.
There are also a great many possibilities on the General Mills brand list. It might be hard to pick just one brand, unless it's Wheaties Field (I could live with that).
So I'm throwing this long list of company names out there. And though I think all of these companies are in the running, I also have a hunch that
other factors may play some sort of role in this transaction.
All of this leaves out the best way to name a park: after the team's history. Right now there is certainly some sentiment for Puckett Park, and it would be difficult to pick one legend over another. But Killebrew was here at the beginning, hit all those homeruns, played for peanuts because he loved the game, and is just about the nicest guy you'll ever meet. Naming a park after him would say something to future generations about what is important to the game.
Of course, the same may be said about naming a ballpark after a big bank.
To utilized enhanced comment features, please enable cookies in your browser.
Star Tribune 100 (2006)
Star Tribune 100 (2006)
I've bolded those which I think could actually be a possibility (and a couple I wish could be...)
1 Target Corp. - Retail/Service
2 UnitedHealth Group - Health/Medical
3 Best Buy Co. Inc. - Retail/Service
4 St. Paul Travelers Companies Inc. - Financial Service
5 3M Co. - Manufacturing
6 Supervalu Inc. - Retail/Service
7 U.S. Bancorp - Financial Service
8 Northwest Airlines Corp. - Retail/Service
9 General Mills Inc. - Manufacturing
10 Medtronic Inc. - Health/Medical
11 Xcel Energy Inc. - Utility
12 Ameriprise Financial Inc. - Financial Service
13 C.H. Robinson Worldwide Inc. - Retail/Service
14 Hormel Foods Corp. - Manufacturing
15 Mosaic Co. - Manufacturing
16 Nash Finch Co. - Retail/Service
17 Ecolab Inc. - Manufacturing
18 PepsiAmericas Inc. - Manufacturing
19 Bemis Co. Inc. - Manufacturing
20 Alliant Techsystems - Manufacturing
21 Pentair Inc. - Manufacturing
22 St. Jude Medical Inc. - Health/Medical
23 Valspar Corp. - Manufacturing
24 Patterson Companies Inc. - Health/Medical
25 Regis Corp. - Retail/Service
26 Polaris Industries Inc. - Manufacturing
27 The Toro Co. - Manufacturing
28 Deluxe Corp. - Financial Service
29 Donaldson Co. Inc. - Manufacturing
30 Fastenal Co. - Retail/Service
31 H.B. Fuller Co. - Manufacturing
32 Ceridian Corp. - Information Technology
33 Imation Corp. - Information Technology
34 TCF Financial Corp. - Financial Service
35 ADC Telecommunications Inc. - Information Technology
36 Otter Tail Corp. - Utility
37 MoneyGram International Inc. - Financial Service
38 G&K Services Inc. - Retail/Service
39 Pemstar Inc. - Manufacturing
40 Fair Isaac Corp. - Financial Service
41 Gander Mountain Co. - Retail/Service
42 Piper Jaffray Companies - Financial Service
43 Allete - Utility
44 Arctic Cat Inc. - Manufacturing
45 Graco Inc. - Manufacturing
46 ValueVision Media Inc. - Retail/Service
47 Select Comfort Corp. - Manufacturing
48 Apogee Enterprises Inc. - Manufacturing
49 Hutchinson Technology Inc. - Information Technology
50 Navarre Corp. - Retail/Service
51 Tennant Co. - Manufacturing
52 Rural Cellular Corp. - Utility
53 Christopher & Banks Corp. - Retail/Service
54 MAIR Holdings Inc. - Retail/Service
55 Entegris Inc. - Manufacturing
56 Wilsons The Leather Experts Inc. - Retail/Service
57 Life Time Fitness Inc. - Retail/Service
58 MTS Systems Corp. - Information Technology
59 Lawson Software - Information Technology
60 Lenox Group Inc. - Retail/Service
61 Analysts International Corp. - Retail/Service
62 Sportsman's Guide Inc. - Retail/Service
63 MGI Pharma Inc. - Health/Medical
64 American Medical Systems Holdings Inc. - Health/Medical
65 ASV Inc. - Manufacturing
66 Buca Inc. - Retail/Service
67 Eschelon Telecom Inc. - Information Technology
68 Digital River Inc. - Information Technology
69 Innovex Inc. - Information Technology
70 Buffalo Wild Wings Inc. - Retail/Service
71 Caribou Coffee Co. - Retail/Service
72 Techne Corp. - Health/Medical
73 Golf Galaxy Inc. - Retail/Service
74 Zomax Inc. - Retail/Service
75 KMG America Corp. - Financial Service
76 Hawkins Inc. - Manufacturing
77 EV3 Inc. - Health/Medical
78 Digi International Inc. - Information Technology
79 Plato Learning Inc. - Information Technology
80 Stellent Inc. - Retail/Service
81 Datalink Corp. - Information Technology
82 Communications Systems Inc. - Information Technology
83 CNS Inc. - Health/Medical
84 Famous Dave's of America Inc. - Retail/Service
85 Rimage Corp. - Information Technology
86 HickoryTech Corp. - Telecommunications/Utility
87 FSI International Inc. - Manufacturing
88 Nortech Systems Inc. - Manufacturing
89 Identix Inc. - Information Technology
90 Stratasys Inc. - Information Technology
91 Fargo Electronics Inc. - Information Technology
92 Appliance Recycling Centers of America - Retail/Service
93 SoftBrands Inc. - Information Technology
94 HMN Financial Inc. - Financial Service
95 SurModics Inc. - Health/Medical
96 Medtox Scientific Inc. - Health/Medical
97 Possis Medical Inc. - Health/Medical
98 Synovis Life Technologies Inc. - Health/Medical
99 RTW Inc. - Financial Service
100 Lifecore Biomedical Inc. - Health/Medical
Source: Star Tribune
Copyright 2006 Star Tribune. All rights reserved.
This page was last modified on January 21, 2010.
"You talk about the magic, the aura, but what really makes a stadium is the fans. Concrete doesn't talk back to you. Chairs don't talk back to you. It's the people who are there, day in, day out, that makes the place magic."
– Bernie Williams
Explore the Site
Here are 50 images chosen randomly from the 3045 found on this site. Click the image to be taken to the original post. A new list is created every 10 minutes.
Hey! An unnumbered gate!
Hit gap, win suit!
Note that, even though the scoreboard appears strategically placed, it's the outfield stands which block any potential view of the field from this roof.
Rod Carew will greet you, but he's sorely in need of a home plate for reference. (Killebrew is too.)
Click to enlarge. (Photo by Tyler Wycoff)
Here's a closer look at the bullpen area. It's hard to tell for sure, but I think there is still an opening to the concourse right above.
Construction of the stands is moving from left to right in this image.
Poles through the gap
View from the Overlook
New Year's Eve, 2008
A slightly different angle, and you can see some of the structural elements.
Bassett Creek's path through the ballpark site (Source: Minneapolis Public Library)
These openings will facilitate access to the catwalks which run throughout the canopy.
LRT at the ballpark
This is what I was working on while my photo was taken (click to see a VERY BIG version).
The rules were clearly posted next to this new entry point on the Seventh Street side. I have no problem with the rules!
The flowers don't have quite the fullness depicted in the original sketches (where they were positively overflowing), but they are quite lovely -- a great, subtle touch. And that's probably a very challenging place to grow anything.
You are forgiven for wondering whether architect Tom Oslund is, in fact, a visitor from the future.
10 years ago, Bruce Lambrecht looked at this land and thought, "Why NOT a ballpark here?" It took a long time before anybody else saw the same potential.
The top of a warehouse visible beyond a parking ramp.
Footings for the Seventh Street walkway from the A ramp.
Concourse ceilings (from the Ballpark Authority's May update)
The tracks on the right will be moved to the newly-cleared area on the left. The edge of the ballpark will be about where the rocks and dirt meet.
Click to enlarge.
Who Owns What (Click for larger version. Source: Ballpark Authority)
The Ron Coomer corner features a bar.
B ramp at left, ballpark at right (and visible far away through the tiny crack)
Now we know what the English phone booths were for...
(Click to enlarge greatly)
Skyline to the left of me, jokers to the right, here I am, stuck in the outfield with you... (click to enlarge)
BPM - Ballpark Magic
BRT - Bus Rapid Transit
DSP - Dave St. Peter
FSE - Full Season Equivalent
FYS - Fake Yankee Stadium (see also: NYS)
HERC - Hennepin Energy Resource Company (aka the Garbage Burner)
HPB - Home Plate Box
HRP - Home Run Porch
LC - Legends Club
LRT - Light Rail Transit
MBA - Minnesota Ballpark Authority (will own Target Field)
MOA - Mall of America
MSFC - Minnesota Sports Facilities Commission (owns the Metrodome)
NYS - New Yankee Stadium
SRO - Standing Room Only
STH - Season Ticket Holder
TCFBS - TCF Bank Stadium
TF - Target Field
Selected Bibliography - Analysis
First Edition (1992)
Second Edition (2006)
Selected Bibliography - Surveys
Second Edition (1987)
Not a "Third Edition" exactly,
but it replaced the above title
(2000, large coffee table)
Original edition (2000, round)
Revised edition (2006, round)
(2001, medium coffee table)
(2002, small coffee table)
(2003, medium coffee table)
(2004, very large coffee table)
(2006, very large coffee table)
Combines the previous two titles
(2007, medium coffee table)
Selected Bibliography - Nostalgia
Book and six ballpark miniatures