BallparkMagic.com
Next game at Target Field: White Sox at Twins
Wishful Fields Archive    Target Field History    Theme: Login    Cart (Empty)

Fake History?

October 27, 2006 1:36 PM

While perusing the many suggestions the Twins have received from fans, I came across this one that pretty much sums up how a lot of people feel:

From outside the stadium, it should look and feel as though this stadium were built 50-75-100 years ago.

This is the legacy of Camden Yards. Now everyone wants a ballpark that looks like or seems like or kinda gives the impression that it was built during the classic ballpark era. By that, they usually mean arched window openings and exposed brick and steel.

Camden Yards is a great park, but it was an even better marketing move. Major League Baseball has long been selling nostalgia as their primary product, and what better storefront than something that looks like it's from those misty yesteryears.

But is this what we really want? Do we want fake history?

There is at least one reason to build in this style, so let's get that out of the way. Our new park will be built smack dab in the middle of the Minneapolis warehouse district, which can reasonably be described as teeming with really old buildings.

Wyman-Partridge building

The top of a warehouse visible beyond a parking ramp.

This is at least the impression it gives, and for the most part it's true. But if you drive the neighborhood these days, you'll find a startlingly large number of new buildings tucked in among the classic old boxes. The area has become very attractive to condo developers and businesses, and every patch of vacant land seems to have something new sprouting on it. Many of these new buildings are blissfully unaware of their surroundings.

But if you think about those surroundings for a minute, you realize that the area has long been kind of a patchwork of styles. On one side of the ballpark site sits the now-infamous garbage burner, whose architectural style is, um, non-descript. Directly across the freeway is Target Center -- a building whose original facade was completely scrapped after construction had already started because it was so hated by architecture critics. (The replacement is only one notch better.) Separating the site from the city is a row of gigantic parking ramps built in the 1980s and 90s to house the scores of carpools coming in on I-394 (snicker if you will). The concept drawings of the new Twinsville condos seem rather neutral toward their surroundings.

Ford Centre

The former Ford manufacturing plant (now Ford Centre).

About the only thing warehouse-y nearby is Ford Centre (the old Ford manufacturing plant) and the records storage building (which I think is being renovated into lofts). Echoing these would be appropriate, but the ballpark will certainly overwhelm everything else in the vicinity, so care must be taken. Better yet, the lack of close warehouses should be welcomed because it actually affords an opportunity.

So here are some reasons not to build a so-called "retro" park.

First, it's been done. Not once or twice, but eight times by my count (not counting three or more still on the drawing board). You would think we would have learned something from the concrete donut era. Nice as they are, after awhile they all start to look alike.

Watching the World Series, I tried to get a sense for the new Busch Stadium, and tried to detect what might make it different from the pack. Unfortunately, I have to admit that it looks utterly bland on the screen. Maybe it's different in person -- and I'm sure it's a great park -- but it would be nice if there were something visible to make it instantly distinguishable from all the others. I haven't seen this so far. (If you have, please add it below.)

Second, there were other classic stadium eras which did not involve brick, exposed steel girders, or asymmetry. I'm thinking specifically of Dodger Stadium, which is widely regarded as one of the gems in the game. It bears more than a passing resemblance to Met Stadium (which was built almost simultaneously), and there would be more sense in connecting our new park to that era than to the one before it (when the franchise was playing games in the rather homely Griffith Stadium).

Tiger Stadium

No arches. No brick. No girders. Classic.

Tiger Stadium is another classic which doesn't look like any other park. You could argue that what makes it a classic is its uniqueness. No other park is anything like it. There is great value in this.

Third, there are so many other possibilities for great designs. If you've never seen it, take a look at the design which was proposed for Labatt Park in Montreal. There is some serious creativity at work there, and there would have been no mistaking that park for any other. It also has a rather small footprint, suggesting that some of the principles might be appropriate here.

Fourth, fake history sucks. You can smell it a mile away. One of the reasons Camden Yards works is that there is real history built right into the park. Without that opportunity, anything you create will be artificial. One thing we have to admit is that the Twins/Senators ballpark history is pretty shoddy. Here's a chance to build something the right way -- without copying or faking anything.

Start by embracing a unique site which has been a transportation hub for 150 years -- and will become even more of a crossroads in the next century. Add to this the franchise's deep connection with Walter "Big Train" Johnson. Then mix in the idea that this franchise has started to win by redefining how small market teams work. This franchise has become a trailblazer.

Our new ballpark should be nothing less.

Comments


To utilized enhanced comment features, please enable cookies in your browser.

I agree with you. As long as HOK doesn't get a hold of the contract (which I seriously doubt), the Twins park should be something of a renaissance in itself. Personally, I'd like to see a cantilever grandstand (similar to the Met) with the suites offered tucked neatly within. The history of the Warehouse District itself gives enough history to not need to build one (like Petco)

Posted on November 1, 2006 at 3:25 PM by Eric Highlight this comment 1

The ballpark needs to be named "Kirby Puckett Park."

Posted on November 12, 2006 at 4:54 PM by Peter A. Highlight this comment 2

what about something like the new guthrie?

Posted on November 19, 2006 at 8:56 PM by Highlight this comment 3

There was nothing wrong with the old met. They could name it metropolitan stadium again offer lots of places for tailgaiting like the old met have a scoreboard like the old met heck why not build a replica of the old metintersting thought but none of thats gonna happen. What probably is going to happen is A way to modern stadium with some big coporate name that caters to the people that have big bucks to spend leaving the average fan out of the picture what a shame.

Posted on November 29, 2006 at 02:30 AM by OldFan Highlight this comment 4

Hide Facebook box
93 recent recognized visitors, including: antifire, ben, CSG Mike, DeePee, Expectorate, FD, fiesta, gogotwins, grizzly adams, jared, JCE, jctwins, Jfh, Joe117, Jon, Jorge, LC, luke, Mike, ole, Rick, Stevie B, terry, TheTruthHurts, Tom D., trebor651, Uffda, Winona Mike
Name
  
Password*
  
Email or Link (optional)
 
Comment
Formatting:   [b]bold[/b]   [i]italic[/i]   [link=url]description[/link]   [img=url]   (Comments containing urls are moderated.)
  
 
* A password is not required, but if you create one, no one else will be able to post with the same name.

This page was last modified on January 21, 2010.



"You talk about the magic, the aura, but what really makes a stadium is the fans. Concrete doesn't talk back to you. Chairs don't talk back to you. It's the people who are there, day in, day out, that makes the place magic."

– Bernie Williams

Explore the Site

Here are 50 images chosen randomly from the 3042 found on this site. Click the image to be taken to the original post. A new list is created every 10 minutes.


Ballpark elevation viewed from the promenade (HERC plant) side. (Click to enlarge.)



This area will supposedly show the Twins chronology. Will it stretch back to 1901?



That is the gun-metal gray wall of The Stadium just beyond the elevated tracks.



New Concept Drawing - No Roof






Did you know that the out-of-town scoreboard is covered by a black chain 1ink fence?






Working on the connecting LRT tracks (this view looks up Fifth Street toward downtown.)



Bruce Lambrecht on the roof of the Minikahda building.



Noah is checking out the ample leg room and truly exemplary sight lines.






What has been actually built so far is only a tiny subset of this vision.









Close-up on the diagram of the Club Level with finishing materials (click to enlarge)






Bag checking at Ball Park Lanes was incredibly simple, as was the pick up later. The line was short and fast-moving.



End of the line.









Ballpark elevation diagram, viewed from Fifth Street. (Click to enlarge.)



Reverse stairway view






Now looking north, the tracks emerge from beneath Seventh Street as freight tracks only. The Northstar line ends at the northwest corner of the ballpark. One day, however, you can bet that other passenger trains will approach from the southwest metro on these tracks -- if our legislators are smart and persistent, that is.









OK, it doesn't really look like that at all...






Miller Park: Gymnasium with skylight (Source: RP)



Roll-up metal doors visible at right.






Here is Seventh Street viewed from the west looking toward downtown. This will probably be the most pedestrian-friendly side (other than the plaza), but only if there is some psychological barrier between the people on foot and the people in their dangerously fast-moving automobiles.



(Click to enlarge.)



Good seats, but no scoreboard or sky.



Saturday afternoon, KMSP-HD 720P



This is a slightly blurry view of the pavilion in center. It has a quirky shape, but one which is completely consistent with the overall ballpark design. Nice work there. You can also get a glimpse of the greenery which will rise above the fences.






This looks south and shows the track configuration for Northstar. The platform shown is just a placeholder. To the best of my knowledge, concept drawings for this platform have not been released. Keep in mind, this is NOT part of the ballpark project. It is completely separate.



Looking up toward Sixth Street.






These tracks actually travel beneath the admin building and come out on the other side



Photo by Tyler Wycoff



This view, from the Minnekahda building (or possibly a predecessor), looks toward the right field corner. The City Market, at left, occupied the land where the B ramp and Target Plaza now stand (over I-394). And the Overlook now juts out just a little beyond where that driveway enters the railyard.



The Metrodome is converted to its football configuration after the Twins game on August 29, 2002



Here's a first view of the surprisingly spacious walkway on Fifth between the ballpark and the LRT platform.



The past is the future. Seriously.



This view, also from the same warehouse roof, shows the newly-rebuilt viaduct on North Seventh Street.



Sign installer dude



"Original" or "Dinger" Dog



This view is from the roof of a warehouse which stood where the A ramp is today. The HERC is now located where the tracks turned north (toward the top).


Glossary

BPM - Ballpark Magic

BRT - Bus Rapid Transit

DSP - Dave St. Peter

FSE - Full Season Equivalent

FYS - Fake Yankee Stadium (see also: NYS)

HERC - Hennepin Energy Resource Company (aka the Garbage Burner)

HPB - Home Plate Box

HRP - Home Run Porch

LC - Legends Club

LRT - Light Rail Transit

MBA - Minnesota Ballpark Authority (will own Target Field)

MOA - Mall of America

MSFC - Minnesota Sports Facilities Commission (owns the Metrodome)

NYS - New Yankee Stadium

SRO - Standing Room Only

STH - Season Ticket Holder

TCFBS - TCF Bank Stadium

TF - Target Field

Selected Bibliography - Analysis
 


(1993)
 


First Edition (1992)
 


Second Edition (2006)
 


(2008)
 

Selected Bibliography - Surveys
 


(1975)
 


Second Edition (1987)
 


Not a "Third Edition" exactly,
but it replaced the above title
(2000)
 


(2000, large coffee table)
 


Original edition (2000, round)
 


Revised edition (2006, round)
 


(2001, medium coffee table)
 


(2002, small coffee table)
 


(2003, medium coffee table)
 


(2004, very large coffee table)
 


(2006, very large coffee table)
 


Combines the previous two titles
(2007, medium coffee table)
 

Selected Bibliography - Nostalgia
 


(1992)
 


Book and six ballpark miniatures
(2004)
 

Complete Bibliography

BallparkMagic™  •  3300 Bloomington Avenue  •  Minneapolis, MN 55407  •  (612) 392-3104
This is a fan site and in no way affiliated with the Minnesota Twins, Minnesota Ballpark Authority, or Major League Baseball.
Unless otherwise noted, this page and all of its contents are Copyright © 2001-2010 BallparkMagic/Lowell (Rick) Prescott.
All Rights Reserved. Used by permission. Privacy Notice