Next game at Target Field: Royals at Twins
Playoff Challenge    Archive    Target Field History    Theme:

Officially Nuts

June 25, 2007 6:46 PM

It's every bit as crazy as has been hinted at all along: Land Partners II thinks their low-lying, unstable, former railroad yard is worth $65.375 million. And what's even crazier is that they think they could have gotten that much for it even if no one wanted to build a ballpark there!

Keep in mind that, in theory, the court is to determine the value of the land regardless of the purpose for which it is being condemned. In other words, they will try to determine a value as if nothing special were going on there. The amount which comes out of this should be the same amount that LPII could have gotten on the open market back in 2005 (adjusted for inflation).

I'm no expert at this, so I have no idea what to expect from the court. But I think that mentioning the value of the land sale to the Vikings is tantamount to saying, "My house is worth the same as that other house way across town, even though mine is in a completely different neighborhood, with less bedrooms, worse soil, and a much lousier view." We all know the first three rules of real estate value: Location. Location. Location.

Beyond that, during the introduction to the site provided by the Twins, a representative from Mortenson construction said, in an off-hand manner, that the land could never have been used for high-rise construction because it was not stable enough. High-rise buildings, he said, have all their weight concentrated on one relatively small area. The difference with a stadium is that the weight is distributed more or less evenly across a much larger area. His implication was that almost nothing but a stadium (or perhaps some other low-rise building) could have replaced surface parking due to the geologic conditions there.

Don't blame LPII for trying to cash in, but don't be surprised if the final number is nowhere near their pie-in-the-sky demand. They probably would have done way better without seeming so, well, grabby.

On the other side of the coin, just how bone-headed does Hennepin County look right now? They appear to have made a stupid assumption, dragged their feet, allowed silence to fester into animosity for months and months, and then tried to smooth it all over by essentially whimpering, "I thought we had a deal..."

There's no question that the land is going to cost them millions more than it would have if they'd made a deal within a few weeks of the law being passed (or at least as soon as was possible given whatever had to happen legally behind the scenes). The Twins have saved their asses, that much is for sure.

And let's not let that point go without some emphasis. This really should not have been the team's problem, but they stepped up with some cash (in exchange for considerations, of course, but still). If it's true that the team will ultimately contribute 35% of the overall cost of the park, that's a better deal than almost any other governmental body has gotten from a pro sports franchise in a very long time.

So I guess it's still an open question about how this proceeding will affect the ballpark which is ultimately built. That's for another day.

As much as I hate to, it looks like I have to moderate the comments for a while. Rest assured that anyone who can state their question or comment in a reasonable manner will find that it gets through right away.


To utilized enhanced comment features, please enable cookies in your browser.

Well, I guess I was a little off when I said they were asking for something in the 40 million range, in hope of negotiating and ending up in the upper 20s. Of course maybe this is a lot less reasonable than what they asked for then....there's no reason for them to not try to break the bank now. The court doesn't care how outrageous the overall claims are.

For what it's worth, people from the county kept mentioning $13 million, but they're now saying $17 million. If that is their minimum, I'm guessing that the final figure will be over $20 million.

Posted on June 25, 2007 at 9:48 PM by Craig in MN Highlight this comment 1

Since you've mentioned that the Twins are still making changes with the ballpark seats, is there any chance that Santee & St. Peter will consider moving the upper decks closer to the field? Click the link for the deck profile.

Posted on June 25, 2007 at 10:30 PM by Chris G Highlight this comment 2

From Dave St Peter's Blog

I’m pleased to report Twins fans will soon be able to monitor developments at and around the new ballpark site from the comfort of their home or office with the simple click of a mouse. Yes, the Twins Ballpark Webcam is in the process of being installed and is expected to be up and running at in a matter of days.

The Twins and are working in conjunction with the technology provider Earthcam on the installation of the high-tech camera which will be located on the top of the 33 South Sixth Tower (formerly the Multifoods Tower in downtown Minneapolis). Fans will be amazed at the capabilities of the webcam as they will be able to zoom-in to the intricacies of the site. Most importantly, the webcam will give Twins fans real-time access to the ballpark site as the project kicks into full gear later this summer.

Stay tuned to for more updates on the Twins Ballpark Webcam.

I’ll be back in touch soon with additional ballpark news and notes.

Win Twins!!!

Dave St. Peter

President, Minnesota Twins"

Posted on June 26, 2007 at 10:32 AM by MOJO Highlight this comment 3

Here is a link with the ticket prices for the new Washington ballpark.

Posted on June 28, 2007 at 11:52 PM by Lafferty Daniel Highlight this comment 4

Wow, 24 separate price levels for the Nationals ballpark. What marketing genius came up with that? The Metrodome has 9 price levels, and that's including the sold-out 3-row "Dugout Box" section behind home plate. How can you even color code that many price levels effectively? And can you imagine fitting that onto a pocket schedule?

Furthermore, the prices are through the roof. Outfield seats are all $10+ more than the Dome's HR Porch, and the $5 bleacher seats are relegated to two sections in the corner of the fourth deck. This is DESPITE the $611 million cost, 100% financed by the city of Washington. The Nationals ballpark seems to represent everything that is wrong with modern publicly-funded pro sports facilities, and the Twins and Hennepin County would be wise to follow a different model!

Posted on June 29, 2007 at 10:38 AM by spycake Highlight this comment 5

For $611 million they are building a bland, boring HoK park that neglects the greco-roman D.C. architecture.

Having 20 or so different prices for tickets isn't a new concept. Unfortunately, we shouldn't compare ticket prices to the Metrodome. Take a look at prices in Denver, St. Louis, Pittsburgh, and Detroit to get a better idea of how much we'll be paying for tickets in 2010.

Posted on June 29, 2007 at 1:14 PM by Lafferty Daniel Highlight this comment 6

Well, Detroit and Pittsburgh have about 15 different price levels, and St. Louis (whose park just opened last year) has 22. So yeah, I'd say it's a relatively new concept, and growing.

As for prices, Pittsburgh has $9-$14 tickets in LF bleachers, and $17 seats in RF. Their price structure is actually comparable to the Dome. The key will be providing those seats -- current plans look good in LF, not so good in RF. Judging solely on price, Detroit doesn't seem bad either. The newest park you cite (St. Louis) is absolutely terrible for price -- it's $13 for standing room tickets, and Premium games add $5. What qualifies as Premium in St. Louis? Apparently any Saturday game, for starters. ("Grain Belt Premium Games" would be an interesting tie-in, though...) Colorado is probably not a good comparison, as they have 50,000 capacity, but their prices aren't very good anyway, and neither are most of the seats.

The Dome is really the last of a breed -- some would say an ugly breed, but it might be the closest thing to a relaxed, no-frills baseball experience you can get in the majors anymore. I think people will remember the Dome more fondly when they discover they can't move more than 10 seats in the new park without violating ticket price boundaries, and when they realize how much money they spend in the virtual mall that is the wider concourse rather than simply staying in their seat to watch the game. That is, if they can even get a ticket to the new park, much less afford it.

Posted on June 29, 2007 at 2:03 PM by spycake Highlight this comment 7

Spycake, my girlfriend and I go to a lot of Dodger games. We usually buy top deck seats at Dodger Stadium for $8 each and "move up" right behind homeplate almost every game. We did the same thing in San Diego not too long ago. It can be done, and will be done in the new ballpark. You have to be crafty or find an older ticket usher who isn't paying attention. In two weeks we're visiting AT&T Park in San Francisco. We purchased Standing Room Only seats but I guarantee we will be sitting in $100 seats by the 4th inning.


Posted on June 29, 2007 at 2:38 PM by Lafferty Daniel Highlight this comment 8

Look, it's another HoK park with a red brick exterior.

Click the link to see construction photos of Citi Field.

Posted on June 29, 2007 at 5:35 PM by Lafferty Daniel Highlight this comment 9

Any new updates??

Posted on July 5, 2007 at 5:14 PM by ?? Highlight this comment 10

Just an editorial written by Aron Kahn, a complete tool siding with LP II in yesterdays Strib.

Posted on July 6, 2007 at 01:55 AM by Floyd Highlight this comment 11

This page was last modified on January 21, 2010.

"You talk about the magic, the aura, but what really makes a stadium is the fans. Concrete doesn't talk back to you. Chairs don't talk back to you. It's the people who are there, day in, day out, that makes the place magic."

– Bernie Williams

Explore the Site

Here are 50 images chosen randomly from the 3046 found on this site. Click the image to be taken to the original post. A new list is created every 10 minutes.

Concept drawing of Coomer gate (click to enlarge)

This looks toward the middle of the park. The third base side of the Legends Club is to the right up ahead, while the 573 Club is just barely visible at the end of the hallway. It extends to the left.

They help create a psychological safe area along the plaza edge, and help you forget that cars are zipping by directly beneath you.

Home Plate Box, Section 111, Row 8 or 9-ish (Click to enlarge greatly.)

These are the outside tracks which go under the promenade

LRT station has appeared.

From last week, you can see the piers taking shape. I believe that the front row, visible here as just forms and reinforcing rods, is the front edge of the plaza.

Ballpark elevation diagram, viewed from Fifth Street. (Click to enlarge.)

Killebrew's mammoth shot on June 3, 1967 is currently memorialized on a wall at the Mall of America

On this day, George was handling fruits and veggies right inside gate 34.

Click to enlarge greatly. See yourself?

Did you know that the out-of-town scoreboard is covered by a black chain 1ink fence?

8:02 PM It's at peak, affecting mostly the upper deck.

Though there's nothing there now, you have to believe they'll find a way to add a party deck up there at some point.

Looking down Sixth Avenue toward the plaza

Notice the temporary railing extensions

Home Run Porch Terrace

I will take a picture of just about anything.

The Pantheon (with inset of the magic eye)


BPM - Ballpark Magic

BRT - Bus Rapid Transit

DSP - Dave St. Peter

FSE - Full Season Equivalent

FYS - Fake Yankee Stadium (see also: NYS)

HERC - Hennepin Energy Resource Company (aka the Garbage Burner)

HPB - Home Plate Box

HRP - Home Run Porch

LC - Legends Club

LRT - Light Rail Transit

MBA - Minnesota Ballpark Authority (will own Target Field)

MOA - Mall of America

MSFC - Minnesota Sports Facilities Commission (owns the Metrodome)

NYS - New Yankee Stadium

SRO - Standing Room Only

STH - Season Ticket Holder

TCFBS - TCF Bank Stadium

TF - Target Field

Selected Bibliography - Analysis


First Edition (1992)

Second Edition (2006)


Selected Bibliography - Surveys


Second Edition (1987)

Not a "Third Edition" exactly,
but it replaced the above title

(2000, large coffee table)

Original edition (2000, round)

Revised edition (2006, round)

(2001, medium coffee table)

(2002, small coffee table)

(2003, medium coffee table)

(2004, very large coffee table)

(2006, very large coffee table)

Combines the previous two titles
(2007, medium coffee table)

Selected Bibliography - Nostalgia


Book and six ballpark miniatures

Complete Bibliography

BallparkMagic™  •  3300 Bloomington Avenue  •  Minneapolis, MN 55407  •  (612) 392-3104
This is a fan site and in no way affiliated with the Minnesota Twins, Minnesota Ballpark Authority, or Major League Baseball.
Unless otherwise noted, this page and all of its contents are Copyright © 2001-2010 BallparkMagic/Lowell (Rick) Prescott.
All Rights Reserved. Used by permission. Privacy Notice