January 18, 2014 1:15 AM
In case you missed it, here are all the details on the replay rules.
This one caught my eye:
Once the manager has exhausted his ability to challenge plays during the game and after the beginning of the seventh inning, the crew chief may choose to invoke instant replay on any reviewable call. In that circumstance, the crew chief is not obligated to invoke instant replay if requested by the manager.
It's unclear whether the umps can themselves request a review prior to the seventh inning, or if they must wait for a manager to request it. That would seem to need some clarification (although maybe the assumption is that the umps would never do that on their own).
The key thing is that they are compelled to review a play as long as a manager has his challenge left and it's before the seventh inning. After that point, the umps are not compelled to do what the manager asks, but clearly the manager could still ask for a review, and it could still be granted. And the umps could make the call themselves (without a request) at that point.
Using the seventh inning as a cut-off point seems sort of arbitrary. I suppose the fear is that managers might use frivolous challenges to allow a reliever more time to warm up or something like that. But blown calls (or potentially blown calls) are just as likely in the ninth as any other time. And if the game is on the line, replay review is just as important then as ever.
And I wonder about extra-inning games. Shouldn't the challenges reset at some point?
Of course, what I don't like about these new rules is that the umps are ever forced to do something. It would make more sense to me if these late-inning rules were actually always the rules. But it's easy to see that the managers would object to taking away their right to force something. That's actually a small victory for the managers, who throughout the history of the game have never actually been able to force an ump to do anything.
In fact, that may be the defining element of this rule change. The dynamic between umps and managers is modified, to a degree yet to be determined (albeit probably pretty subtle).
Sadly, that little bit of control may actually reduce the number of times we get to see Gardy throw his hat and kick dirt and chew out an ump. I guess there will always be balls and strikes to argue over... (Somewhere, Lou Piniella is spinning in his grave. What? Still alive? OK, he'll be spinning in his chair in a broadcast booth somewhere.)
Two other things look interesting:
Clubs will now have the right to show replays of all close plays on its ballpark scoreboard, regardless of whether the play is reviewed.
This will surely be the greatest gain in the rule change for fans in the stands. It's long overdue, and I'm convinced that the only reason the old policy was ever adopted in the first place was as a face-saving measure for the umpires. I never bought the line that teams don't want to rile up the fans. We've always known that that's exactly what teams want to do.
The question remains whether they will show replays which will go against the home team. I hope they always show them.
No monitors or additional electronic equipment will be permitted in the dugout.
When, oh, when will MLB get over this? Technology really isn't the enemy. These are modern tools. Why forbid their use? It really makes no sense.
This rule change is, in itself, an admission that technology is now a friend of the game. It's time to let the managers and coaches watch the replays whenever and however they want to for decision-making. (It's probably fueled by fears about stealing signs or something crazy like that.)
But, no, instead we get this anachronism:
To determine whether to challenge a play, personnel in the dugout will be permitted to communicate with a video specialist in the clubhouse who has access to the same video that is available to replay officials. This communication will occur via the dugout phone.
"Yeah, Gardy, that guy was safe. Go challenge."
OK, it's an anachronism, but what a great gig. Hey, Dave St. Peter! I want this job!
To utilized enhanced comment features, please enable cookies in your browser.
This page was last modified on January 18, 2014.
"You talk about the magic, the aura, but what really makes a stadium is the fans. Concrete doesn't talk back to you. Chairs don't talk back to you. It's the people who are there, day in, day out, that makes the place magic."
– Bernie Williams
Explore the Site
Here are 50 images chosen randomly from the 3045 found on this site. Click the image to be taken to the original post. A new list is created every 10 minutes.
For some inexplicable reason, a lot of the new parks being built these days feature grand staircases like this one.
September 23, 2007
I saw it at another park...
This is the plaza as viewed from the A ramp.
Opening day, 2010
Banners on the parking ramp are a great touch. They help manage scale and turn a lemon into lemonade. On my way there today I passed the WCCO building and remembered how the Twins schedule used to be painted in giant form on the side of that building (which is no longer visible). Wouldn't that be a great thing to resurrect on the side of that ramp? A giant Twins schedule. I always thought that was cool.
Look familiar? Unfortunately, just adding little balconies with cool angles will not offset the pervading ugliness.
Ye Olde Tyme Vegetable Cart (and its modern cousin)
This is the entrance behind home plate (not visible in the renderings which have been released). It shows that the upper deck is set back from the facade -- a very good thing if it remains in the final design.
The green is a composite of the topmost seating areas in the new ballpark. The gray is a scale diagram of the Metrodome.
Today's match-up (click to enlarge)
TC gets ready to release the hounds. (Kids get to run the bases after Sunday games.)
Fencing is going up all along the plaza
The view from the Penn Ave entrance to 394 (and all the way into town! Click to enlarge)
Twins president Dave St. Peter presents his list of fan suggestions to the Ballpark Authority
Here we are waiting for the first train to arrive at the station (Nov 14).
Looking through it, you can see the outfield pavilion (upper deck at least).
The heretofore unseen north facade (click to enlarge). Does it look like a ballpark? And what's with the bamboo?
That's Noah and my brother, Chris, checking out the Loge Box amenities
Having fun. Installing limestone. Good gig.
At left, across the tracks by that pile of dirt is where the Northstar commuter train platform will be built, and where Twins fans will apparently NOT be able to get a train after night games. (For reference, that's the Fifth Street bridge, with the ballpark site just beyond it. The east corner of Ford Centre is just visible at the right edge of the picture.)
Concept drawing of Coomer gate (click to enlarge)
Detail of the train tunnels (click to view the entire drawing)
Concept drawing for the fan/player appreciation wall. (Click to enlarge.)
This concourse, the uppermost, was built on top of the now-hidden old concourse during the 70s renovation.
The main ticketing area beneath the restaurant.
The green in question (click for very large version)
The canopy as viewed through the outfield stands. The lighting approach, despite what you may have heard, is actually very traditional.
BPM - Ballpark Magic
BRT - Bus Rapid Transit
DSP - Dave St. Peter
FSE - Full Season Equivalent
FYS - Fake Yankee Stadium (see also: NYS)
HERC - Hennepin Energy Resource Company (aka the Garbage Burner)
HPB - Home Plate Box
HRP - Home Run Porch
LC - Legends Club
LRT - Light Rail Transit
MBA - Minnesota Ballpark Authority (will own Target Field)
MOA - Mall of America
MSFC - Minnesota Sports Facilities Commission (owns the Metrodome)
NYS - New Yankee Stadium
SRO - Standing Room Only
STH - Season Ticket Holder
TCFBS - TCF Bank Stadium
TF - Target Field
Selected Bibliography - Analysis
First Edition (1992)
Second Edition (2006)
Selected Bibliography - Surveys
Second Edition (1987)
Not a "Third Edition" exactly,
but it replaced the above title
(2000, large coffee table)
Original edition (2000, round)
Revised edition (2006, round)
(2001, medium coffee table)
(2002, small coffee table)
(2003, medium coffee table)
(2004, very large coffee table)
(2006, very large coffee table)
Combines the previous two titles
(2007, medium coffee table)
Selected Bibliography - Nostalgia
Book and six ballpark miniatures