BallparkMagic.com
Next game at Target Field: Royals at Twins
Playoff Challenge    Archive    Target Field History    Theme: Login    Cart (Empty)

Washington Malaise

March 14, 2007 1:07 AM

I had a quick chance to take a look at the renderings and photographs of the new Washington ballpark over at JDLand. I'd seen some of these renderings before, but it's nice to get a little bit of context.

It's also very cool to see what it looks like when a ballpark starts to emerge from barren land (check out the construction photos). If they ever start building our park, you'll see that type of documentation here.

Nationals Ballpark Site (Twins Site Overlay)

Site plan for the new Nationals ballpark, with the size of the Rapid Park site overlaid

But I have to agree to a certain extent with John's comment below about the looks of this ballpark. I wouldn't exactly call it "ugly", but it will probably never be taken for "soaring architecture" either. In fact, I'm struck by it's blandness and utter lack of personality. It's a good thing that they're planning to install cherry trees, because without them, this building could only inspire yawns.

It has a very massive feel, and part of that is because it's being built on a site over twice as large (20 1/5 acres) as the Rapid Park site the Twins hope to use (see image)! That means there's lots of room to stretch out and build gigantic staircases, observation towers (which will presumably offer observation of only the passing traffic outside the park), and even a full office complex. This is one very large site on which will be built one very large ballpark.

In terms of design, it appears to have almost no facade -- at least no unifying theme around the outside (or the inside for that matter). The elevation diagrams show a building which reveals its skeleton (not necessarily a bad thing), and doesn't really strive to look like anything.

I know that architectural significance was discussed and eventually required when the financing for the park was passed, but that appears to have slipped by the wayside. There is nothing significant here, and almost nothing one might call "architecture". It appears to be pure engineering.

Of course, in that respect it would follow on the history of ballparks in Washington. Griffith Stadium looked like it was put together from a box of spare ballpark parts. (We should also acknowledge that the facade our own beloved Metropolitan Stadium was essentially some sprinklings of colored brick barely concealing rusty iron). I did notice that there are two roof heights, something which may be a nod to old Griffith Stadium.

Part of my dislike is the low and very squat profile. There are no soaring light standards, and only muted vertical lines of any kind. Ballparks, seen from the side, are all essentially short and wide buildings, but adding vertical components (usually having to do with the circulation of people to the various levels) can really make a difference in the overall character of a stadium.

A memorable example of such a detail is the tower built into Wrigley Field in LA. That park also featured flags along to outside perimeter, something you may notice if you look closely at some of the Washington drawings. Unfortunately, those little flags get completely lost in the massive bulk of the Nationals new park, where they really added a touch of flair in California. I think the Washington park really cries out for some unique architectural element to make it distinctive.

So, while the park looks functional, and any new ballpark is an exciting place, there's nothing here which really makes me want to say, "Wow!"

Comments


To utilized enhanced comment features, please enable cookies in your browser.

Good analysis. One other thing I noticed is that the stadium turns its back to the River. No one in that ballpark will know that they are long Christian Guzman flyout from the Anacosta. Opportunity lost (one of many).

Posted on March 14, 2007 at 9:59 PM by DEC Highlight this comment 1

they should have designed the ballpark to mimic the historical structures of our nation's capital. white exterior texture, archs, pillars, fountains.

Posted on March 15, 2007 at 11:08 AM by steve Highlight this comment 2

At least with this venue's field facing
the north, some fans can see the Capitol
Dome (and maybe the Washington Monument).

Posted on March 17, 2007 at 5:09 PM by Chris Highlight this comment 3

Actually, a little bit of research with Google Earth reveals that only a few fans in the upper deck near the right field foul pole will be able to see the Washington Monument.

Likewise, only upper deck fans along the first base line might be able to catch a glimpse of the capitol.

They would have had to align the playing field northwest in order for the majority of fans to be able to see both.

Posted on March 17, 2007 at 5:50 PM by Rick 4

I for one kind've enjoy the squat short feel. the view from the outside would be better if it had some tall elements, but inside the park, its better to have a wide feel. Anyone who's been inside Brewers Ballpark knows what I'm talking about.

Posted on March 22, 2007 at 1:00 PM by Mike Highlight this comment 5


This page was last modified on January 21, 2010.



"You talk about the magic, the aura, but what really makes a stadium is the fans. Concrete doesn't talk back to you. Chairs don't talk back to you. It's the people who are there, day in, day out, that makes the place magic."

– Bernie Williams

Explore the Site

Here are 50 images chosen randomly from the 3045 found on this site. Click the image to be taken to the original post. A new list is created every 10 minutes.








No arches. No brick. No girders. Classic.



That's Fifth Street (and a tattooed arm) in the foreground.



Friendly faces greet you right inside the door of the Legends Club.



Gate 29 Carew



Double plays will be turned here.



Center field seating



The Ceremony (VIP in the crowd)



Final Metrodome baseball sight



A slightly different angle, and you can see some of the structural elements.



Bassett Creek's path through the ballpark site (Source: Minneapolis Public Library)



8:02 PM It's at peak, affecting mostly the upper deck.






Look beyond the gigantic hand (a hounds tooth jacket? really?) and you'll get a glimpse of the main grandstand configuration. The two (or is it three?) levels of suites are visible, as is the design of the so-called "split upper deck," and the extensive use of limestone for decorative accents. Let's hope these little touches don't get cut as costs increase, because they make a nice tie-in from the outside of the park to the inside. Of most interest to me is the way that the very best seats are physically separated from all the rest of the seats by that limestone. There will be virtually no way to sneak into these seats. On one level, that's a somewhat sad design feature...






Emergency access as viewed from outside the ballpark






Name that ballpark



...but you can get a feel for what it will be like.



A whole bunch of guys working on something.



Such promise. (Click to enlarge.)



The past is the future. Seriously.






Special guests in the trees!



A view straight on of the Pro Shop area and ticket windows (just barely visible). The piers you see beneath the plaza are already almost completed (see final photo).












Fissure dude






This design has a rather generic quality to it, but they appear to have considered the B garage. Though it isn't part of the model, they've clearly left room for it.












Our cantilever friends will be happy to learn that there will be sections with views like this in the new stadium.



Suite level view






This was on BPM night. Nice neon, but I'm still waiting to see the homer show.



This is the LRT path looking from the ballpark site (behind me) toward downtown. The line currently ends about two blocks up this street. This bridge over I-394 is also being partially rebuilt as part of the ballpark project.



Concept drawing of Coomer gate (click to enlarge)









Outside the Metropolitan Club, photos of all the other major league ballparks



Trampled, repaired, and re-trampled grass



Reasonable (if not overly generous) leg room






Here's another look at the Oliva gate.








Glossary

BPM - Ballpark Magic

BRT - Bus Rapid Transit

DSP - Dave St. Peter

FSE - Full Season Equivalent

FYS - Fake Yankee Stadium (see also: NYS)

HERC - Hennepin Energy Resource Company (aka the Garbage Burner)

HPB - Home Plate Box

HRP - Home Run Porch

LC - Legends Club

LRT - Light Rail Transit

MBA - Minnesota Ballpark Authority (will own Target Field)

MOA - Mall of America

MSFC - Minnesota Sports Facilities Commission (owns the Metrodome)

NYS - New Yankee Stadium

SRO - Standing Room Only

STH - Season Ticket Holder

TCFBS - TCF Bank Stadium

TF - Target Field

Selected Bibliography - Analysis
 


(1993)
 


First Edition (1992)
 


Second Edition (2006)
 


(2008)
 

Selected Bibliography - Surveys
 


(1975)
 


Second Edition (1987)
 


Not a "Third Edition" exactly,
but it replaced the above title
(2000)
 


(2000, large coffee table)
 


Original edition (2000, round)
 


Revised edition (2006, round)
 


(2001, medium coffee table)
 


(2002, small coffee table)
 


(2003, medium coffee table)
 


(2004, very large coffee table)
 


(2006, very large coffee table)
 


Combines the previous two titles
(2007, medium coffee table)
 

Selected Bibliography - Nostalgia
 


(1992)
 


Book and six ballpark miniatures
(2004)
 

Complete Bibliography

BallparkMagic™  •  3300 Bloomington Avenue  •  Minneapolis, MN 55407  •  (612) 392-3104
This is a fan site and in no way affiliated with the Minnesota Twins, Minnesota Ballpark Authority, or Major League Baseball.
Unless otherwise noted, this page and all of its contents are Copyright © 2001-2010 BallparkMagic/Lowell (Rick) Prescott.
All Rights Reserved. Used by permission. Privacy Notice