BallparkMagic.com
Next game at Target Field: White Sox at Twins
Wishful Fields Archive    Target Field History    Theme: Login    Cart (Empty)

Washington Malaise

March 14, 2007 1:07 AM

I had a quick chance to take a look at the renderings and photographs of the new Washington ballpark over at JDLand. I'd seen some of these renderings before, but it's nice to get a little bit of context.

It's also very cool to see what it looks like when a ballpark starts to emerge from barren land (check out the construction photos). If they ever start building our park, you'll see that type of documentation here.

Nationals Ballpark Site (Twins Site Overlay)

Site plan for the new Nationals ballpark, with the size of the Rapid Park site overlaid

But I have to agree to a certain extent with John's comment below about the looks of this ballpark. I wouldn't exactly call it "ugly", but it will probably never be taken for "soaring architecture" either. In fact, I'm struck by it's blandness and utter lack of personality. It's a good thing that they're planning to install cherry trees, because without them, this building could only inspire yawns.

It has a very massive feel, and part of that is because it's being built on a site over twice as large (20 1/5 acres) as the Rapid Park site the Twins hope to use (see image)! That means there's lots of room to stretch out and build gigantic staircases, observation towers (which will presumably offer observation of only the passing traffic outside the park), and even a full office complex. This is one very large site on which will be built one very large ballpark.

In terms of design, it appears to have almost no facade -- at least no unifying theme around the outside (or the inside for that matter). The elevation diagrams show a building which reveals its skeleton (not necessarily a bad thing), and doesn't really strive to look like anything.

I know that architectural significance was discussed and eventually required when the financing for the park was passed, but that appears to have slipped by the wayside. There is nothing significant here, and almost nothing one might call "architecture". It appears to be pure engineering.

Of course, in that respect it would follow on the history of ballparks in Washington. Griffith Stadium looked like it was put together from a box of spare ballpark parts. (We should also acknowledge that the facade our own beloved Metropolitan Stadium was essentially some sprinklings of colored brick barely concealing rusty iron). I did notice that there are two roof heights, something which may be a nod to old Griffith Stadium.

Part of my dislike is the low and very squat profile. There are no soaring light standards, and only muted vertical lines of any kind. Ballparks, seen from the side, are all essentially short and wide buildings, but adding vertical components (usually having to do with the circulation of people to the various levels) can really make a difference in the overall character of a stadium.

A memorable example of such a detail is the tower built into Wrigley Field in LA. That park also featured flags along to outside perimeter, something you may notice if you look closely at some of the Washington drawings. Unfortunately, those little flags get completely lost in the massive bulk of the Nationals new park, where they really added a touch of flair in California. I think the Washington park really cries out for some unique architectural element to make it distinctive.

So, while the park looks functional, and any new ballpark is an exciting place, there's nothing here which really makes me want to say, "Wow!"

Comments


To utilized enhanced comment features, please enable cookies in your browser.

Good analysis. One other thing I noticed is that the stadium turns its back to the River. No one in that ballpark will know that they are long Christian Guzman flyout from the Anacosta. Opportunity lost (one of many).

Posted on March 14, 2007 at 9:59 PM by DEC Highlight this comment 1

they should have designed the ballpark to mimic the historical structures of our nation's capital. white exterior texture, archs, pillars, fountains.

Posted on March 15, 2007 at 11:08 AM by steve Highlight this comment 2

At least with this venue's field facing
the north, some fans can see the Capitol
Dome (and maybe the Washington Monument).

Posted on March 17, 2007 at 5:09 PM by Chris Highlight this comment 3

Actually, a little bit of research with Google Earth reveals that only a few fans in the upper deck near the right field foul pole will be able to see the Washington Monument.

Likewise, only upper deck fans along the first base line might be able to catch a glimpse of the capitol.

They would have had to align the playing field northwest in order for the majority of fans to be able to see both.

Posted on March 17, 2007 at 5:50 PM by Rick 4

I for one kind've enjoy the squat short feel. the view from the outside would be better if it had some tall elements, but inside the park, its better to have a wide feel. Anyone who's been inside Brewers Ballpark knows what I'm talking about.

Posted on March 22, 2007 at 1:00 PM by Mike Highlight this comment 5


This page was last modified on January 21, 2010.



"You talk about the magic, the aura, but what really makes a stadium is the fans. Concrete doesn't talk back to you. Chairs don't talk back to you. It's the people who are there, day in, day out, that makes the place magic."

– Bernie Williams

Explore the Site

Here are 50 images chosen randomly from the 3042 found on this site. Click the image to be taken to the original post. A new list is created every 10 minutes.


North Loop Deli









The spruced up triangle really doesn't show much connection with the ballpark.



Love the LC!



Boston



Site of the proposed new Atlanta Braves ballpark. Look familiar?



For executive entertaining






A closer look at the grid on the Pro Shop.



What can you see from up there? Some say not much.









The east wall of the building looks like it will be the first part completed. These are probably supports for the plaza, and they hug the very edge of the site.









Here we are waiting for the first train to arrive at the station (Nov 14).









Here's a curious little room at the end of the circulation ramp. What could they be selling there?



Time to paint those supports Vikings-purple.



Wind veil framing



JohnW provides this shot of a construction barricade on First Avenue



Typical SRO view upstairs.



Main concourse, looking toward the admin building.



These tracks actually travel beneath the admin building and come out on the other side



(Click to enlarge greatly)






A mural featuring the names of a bunch of Minnesota towns.






From last week, you can see the piers taking shape. I believe that the front row, visible here as just forms and reinforcing rods, is the front edge of the plaza.



Supports viewed from beneath. These seats will be just a few feet from the outside edge of the building!



The green is a composite of the topmost seating areas in the new ballpark. The gray is a scale diagram of the Metrodome.



This would have been the HERC side, though it's unclear just how far over the plant the retracted roof would have gone. My fear was always that they would have to shorten the track and more of the roof would have stayed over the ballpark. The only good retractable roof is one which disappears when not in use. I don't think they could have realistically created such a thing.



Knothole non-view #2






Target Plaza looking toward the grandstand












Scoreboard as viewed from Fifth Street.






This is a closer look at the steel work.



Detail of the train tunnels (click to view the entire drawing)






This maze of scaffolding is something you'll probably never see again.



The Puckett Atrium









Look closely at the overhang. You'll see the on the right it is flush with the fence, and then it sticks out farther and farther as you move toward center. More fun for Michael Cuddyer.


Glossary

BPM - Ballpark Magic

BRT - Bus Rapid Transit

DSP - Dave St. Peter

FSE - Full Season Equivalent

FYS - Fake Yankee Stadium (see also: NYS)

HERC - Hennepin Energy Resource Company (aka the Garbage Burner)

HPB - Home Plate Box

HRP - Home Run Porch

LC - Legends Club

LRT - Light Rail Transit

MBA - Minnesota Ballpark Authority (will own Target Field)

MOA - Mall of America

MSFC - Minnesota Sports Facilities Commission (owns the Metrodome)

NYS - New Yankee Stadium

SRO - Standing Room Only

STH - Season Ticket Holder

TCFBS - TCF Bank Stadium

TF - Target Field

Selected Bibliography - Analysis
 


(1993)
 


First Edition (1992)
 


Second Edition (2006)
 


(2008)
 

Selected Bibliography - Surveys
 


(1975)
 


Second Edition (1987)
 


Not a "Third Edition" exactly,
but it replaced the above title
(2000)
 


(2000, large coffee table)
 


Original edition (2000, round)
 


Revised edition (2006, round)
 


(2001, medium coffee table)
 


(2002, small coffee table)
 


(2003, medium coffee table)
 


(2004, very large coffee table)
 


(2006, very large coffee table)
 


Combines the previous two titles
(2007, medium coffee table)
 

Selected Bibliography - Nostalgia
 


(1992)
 


Book and six ballpark miniatures
(2004)
 

Complete Bibliography

BallparkMagic™  •  3300 Bloomington Avenue  •  Minneapolis, MN 55407  •  (612) 392-3104
This is a fan site and in no way affiliated with the Minnesota Twins, Minnesota Ballpark Authority, or Major League Baseball.
Unless otherwise noted, this page and all of its contents are Copyright © 2001-2010 BallparkMagic/Lowell (Rick) Prescott.
All Rights Reserved. Used by permission. Privacy Notice